CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES IN ACUTE LEUKEMIA PATIENTS: RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL CYTOGENETICS AND FLUORESCENT IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION ANALYSES
Yilmaz Z1,*, Sahin FI1, Kizilkilic E2, Karakus S3, ?zbek N4, Boga C2, ?zdogu H2
*Corresponding Author: Zerrin Yilmaz, MD, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Kubilay Sokak No. 36, 06570 Maltepe, Ankara, Turkey; Tel.: +90-312-232-44-00/139; Fax: +90-312-232-39-12; E-mail: zerriny@baskent.edu.tr
page: 33

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Patients. A total of 71 acute leukemia patients were referred to our laboratory between January 2002 and August 2004. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee. Samples were taken from patients only after informed consent was obtained. Heparinized bone marrow and/or peripheral blood samples were obtained from patients at initial diagnosis and before any specific therapy was initiated, and were sent to our laboratory for further analysis.

Cultures and G-Banding. Direct, overnight and 72-hour lymphocyte cultures were set up from the samples. Metaphase chromosomes were obtained according to standard procedures and analyzed after G-banding [4]. Karyotypes were set up according to the 1995 International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) [5]. To qualify as a structural clonal aberration, at least two cells with the same chromosomal change had to be found and at least three abnormal metaphases had to be identified to qualify as a chromosomal aneuploidy.

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Studies. The FISH studies were done using commercial probe sets including t(9;22) dual color, dual fusion DNA probe (Q-BIO Gene, Cambridge, MA, USA) t(15;17) dual color translocation probe (Cytocel, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK), inversion 16 dual color breakpoint region probe (Cytocel) and locus specific identification (LSI) MLL (11q23) break apart rearrangement dual color probe (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA). Information about the probes is shown in Table 1. Probes were selected according to the type of leukemia and hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Two hundred nuclei or available metaphase spreads, were analyzed per patient, per probe. Two experienced operators, who were unaware of each other’s results or of the conventional cytogenetics results, analyzed the slides. Nuclei that were overlapping or in which the number of signals was ambiguous were not scored. Cut-off values for each probe were calculated in peripheral blood samples of 10 healthy volunteers by adding three times the standard deviation to the mean percentage of abnormal cells analyzed. For the t(9;22) transloca?tion, t(15;17) translocation, MLL (11q23) break apart and inv(16) breakpoint region probes the cut-off values were calculated to be 4.15, 3.02, 3.16 and 1.93%, respectively.

Table 1. Fluorescent in situ hybridization probes, gene regions they include and signal colors used in the study according to leukemia type.

Probe

Gene and Region

Signal Colors

Leukemia Type

t(9;22)

BCR (22q11.2)

Spectrum green

AML; ALL

 

ABL (9q34)

Spectrum red

 

t(15;17)

PML (15q22)

Spectrum red

AML; ALL




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006