
DETERMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DNA METHYLATION STATUS OF KLOTHO AND ARNTL GENES WITH HYPERTENSION Osum M, Tosun O, Birtan H, Kalkan R *Corresponding Author: Prof. Dr.Rasime Kalkan, PhD, Faculty of Medicine, European University of Lefke, Mersin 10, Lefke 99728, Northern Cyprus, Turkey, kalkanr@yahoo.com, rkalkan@eul.edu.tr page: 41
|
DISCUSSION
Hypertension is an important risk factor for kidney
disease and cardiovascular diseases such as stroke, heart
failure (HF) and arrhythmias [1,2]. The risk of hyper-
tension significantly increases with age in both men and
women [25]. However, the risk of hypertension exhibits
variation based on gender. Particularly, the incidence of
hypertension was found to be higher in postmenopausal
women than those age-matched men and premenopausal
women. It was suggested that obesity-mediated sympathet-
ic activity, low estrogen level, and high renin-angiotensin
system (RAS) activity might contribute to postmenopausal
hypertension [26].
Human KL protein exists as a full-length single-pass
transmembrane protein and soluble KL The soluble KL
protein can be found in blood, urine, and cerebrospinal
fluid [8,9]. A large proportion of soluble KL is provided
from the kidney [7]. KL suppresses oxidative stress and
aldosterone secretion, inhibits insulin/IGF-1 (insulin-like
growth factor 1) and Wnt (wingless-related integration
site) pathways, apoptosis, fibrosis and cell senescence, and
regulates calcium-phosphate homeostasis [1].
KL-deficient mice were indicated to display aging-re-
lated phenotypes, including hypertension, arterial stiffness,
and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [27]. The silencing of
KL gene was found to be related to hypertension and high
level of aldosterone in human adrenocortical cells [28]. It
was indicated that membranous and soluble KL can inhibit
Wnt/β-mediated activation of RAS by blocking the bind-
ing of Wnt ligands, and thus preserving kidney function
and normalizing BP. Therefore, it was suggested that KL
has an ameliatory effect on hypertension in CKD patients
[29]. The soluble KL levels were found to be positively
correlated with high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and negatively correlated with serum triglycerides in
controls, and inversely correlated with body mass index
(BMI) in hypertensive patients [3]. It was suggested that
low plasma KL levels could increase total body sodium in
patients, leading to chronic inflammation and high blood
pressure. In addition, it was indicated that this process could
be related to CKD patients with low serum KL levels [7].
It was reported that women with low serum KL con-
centration have a high risk of postmenopausal hyperten-
sion. It was suggested that serum KL concentration may
be a significant biomarker to evaluate the risk of hyper-
tension in postmenopausal women [26]. Several studies
reported that the lower KL concentration was related to
higher blood pressure, increasing the risk of hypertension
[30,31]. In contrast, serum KL levels were detected not to
be significantly different between subjects with and with-
out hypertension in the general Chinese population [27].
Furthermore, a larger population-based study indicated no
association between serum KL concentration and blood
pressure [32,33]. In our study, we found no statistically
significant link between KL methylation and hypertension
(P>0.05). The difference between the studies’ findings
could be the result of a limited sample size or the age of
the population. Since changes in KL expression have been
reported during aging, focusing on large-scale studies that
evaluate the association between KL concentration, KL
methylation, and hypertension in age-matched patients
with different disease conditions and control subjects
would be important. The soluble KL protein is produced
by the kidney. Therefore, it is claimed that, in cases where
the kidneys are normally functional and soluble KL pro-
tein is at normal levels, KL expression may vary in other
tissues. Thus, it is suggested that KL expression in other
tissues may decline due to different factors, including ge-
netic variants and epigenetic alteration [34]. Therefore,
this information highlights how this situation should be
taken into consideration in further studies.
Particularly, it is defended that the effect of genetic
polymorphisms in the KL gene on blood pressure should
not be ignored [27]. Individuals with the GA+AA genotype
of KL G-395A polymorphism were found to have a lower
SBP, relative to the individuals with the GG genotype [35].
Thus, it was suggested that the A variant of KL G-395A
might prevent the development of essential hypertension
by increasing the KL levels [5, 13]. The uncertain mecha-
nism affecting the human KL promoter region was indi-
cated to inhibit KL gene expression in HEK293 cells [36].
The KL promoter region has been reported to be sensitive
to DNA methylation [37, 38]. The KL-VS variant contains
six variants, and two variants thereof are located in exon
2 cause amino acid substitutions, F352V and C370S. The
KL-VS variant has been associated with enhanced SBP, serum cholesterol and cardiovascular disease in Baltimore
Caucasian and African American subjects [39-41]. A meta-
analysis has indicated that the G-395A, C1818T SNPs of
the KL gene might be associated with a hypertension risk
[2]. The F352V (rs9536314 T> G) polymorphism of the
KL gene was correlated with salt-sensitive hypertension
in an Italian study [14]. The KL rs9536314 and rs564481
polymorphisms were associated with increasing levels of
HDL-C in females [42]. High HDL-C levels were sug-
gested to be protective against KL dysfunction [40]. Par-
ticularly, HDL and KL have been indicated to participate
in the regulation of similar signaling pathways, including
both molecules that promote nitric oxide (NO) synthesis,
angiogenesis, and inhibit apoptosis, and insulin signaling
in cell culture models [42, 43]. The fasting glucose was
found to be predominantly higher in women with the T
allele of KL rs564481 relative to non-carriers in Japanese
[12] and Korean women [11]. It was reported that KL
reduces the levels of serum creatinine. The decrease in KL
expression has been related to aging-related kidney dam-
age. Particularly, enhance in serum creatinine was indi-
cated to be a diagnostic factor of acute kidney injury (AKI)
[29]. Although several studies have reported a relationship
between some biochemical parameters and KL protein, in
our study, the relationship between the methylation status
of KL and fasting glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol,
HDL-C, LDL-C, Na, K, Cr and Urea levels, were not sig-
nificant (p > 0.05). It is considered that these contradictory
results may be due to different genetic backgrounds in dif-
ferent populations. However, levels of K were significantly
different between the methylated KL hypertensive patients
and unmethylated KL control subjects (p= 0,0014).
The circadian clock regulates the circadian oscilla-
tion of human blood flow by enhancing it during the day
and decreasing it during the night [44]. Circadian clock
genes were implicated in modulating many processes in-
volved in the regulation of the blood pressure in the kidney,
heart, vasculature, and metabolic organs [17]. It has been
reported that the circadian oscillation of blood pressure
decreases with age [45].
The global ARNTL knockout (KO) mice were found
to have lower BP with impaired BP rhythm. It was shown
that decreased BP can be associated with changes in the
vasculature in ARNTL KO mice [18]. Furthermore, the
global ARNTL KO mice were indicated to lose diurnal
sodium excretion [46]. Smooth muscle components of the
blood vessel wall provide sufficient blood flow to organs
and blood pressure homeostasis by regulating its contrac-
tile state. Smooth muscle-specific ARNTL KO male mice
were shown to exhibit decreased BP and less impaired BP
rhythm [16]. ARNTL rs3816358 polymorphism has been
related to non-dipper hypertension in young hypertensive patients [47]. In rats, the ARNTL gene was stated to be
situated in hypertension susceptibility loci. The 18477-
T/G variant in the ARNTL promotor was reported to sig-
nificantly decrease the Gata-4-mediated transcriptional
activation of the ARNTL promotor. Moreover, in respect
of this polymorphism, ARNTL promoter activity was in-
dicated to be consistently 2-fold higher in normotensive
Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats than in spontaneously hyper-
tensive rats (SHR) [21]. It is suggested that hypertensive
patients with the GG genotype of ARNTL A1420G may
exhibit high nighttime SBP [48]. The essential arterial
hypertension (EAH) patients with GG genotype of the
circadian locomotor output cycles protein kaput (CLOCK)
257TG polymorphism were found to exhibit lower ARNTL
expression than EAH patients with other genotypes at 9.00,
13:00, and 17:00 time points [49]. The downregulation of
ARNTL levels was detected in hypertensive female patients
[4]. Therefore, all these findings support that ARNTL is
an essential factor during the development of hyperten-
sion. However, the mechanisms underlying ‘’circadian
genes’’ in the regulation of blood pressure have not been
comprehended yet. According to our study, the ARNTL
gene was methylated in 68.7% of the hypertensive sub-
jects and the relationship between methylation status and
hypertension was not significant (p > 0.05). Furthermore,
the relationship between the methylation status of ARNTL
and fasting glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL-C,
LDL-C, Na, K, Cr and Urea levels, were found to not be
significant (p>0.05).
In summary, we did not identify a statistically signifi-
cant association between KLOTHO and ARNTL methyla-
tion status and hypertension and their association with
fasting blood sugar, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-
cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, Na, K, Cr, Urea levels in
hypertensive patients. The limitations of our study are the
age mismatch between patients and controls, and the small
number of participants. Since several factors such as age,
gender and obesity and diabetes are risk factors for hy-
pertension, patients and controls matched by age, gender,
and BMI should be included in future studies to minimize
the impact of these factors on the results [3]. Therefore,
as mentioned in this study, these conditions should not be
ignored in future large population-based studies.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|