
SIMULTANEOUSLY BOTH EXPRESSION OF LMP-1
AND METHYLATION OF E-CADHERIN:
MOLECULAR BIOMARKER IN STAGE IV OF
NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA PATIENTS Lao TD1, Truong PK1, Thieu HH1, Nguyen DH2, Nguyen MT3, Le TAH1,* *Corresponding Author: Associate Professor Thuy A.H. Le, Department of Pharmaceutical and Medical
Biotechnology, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 35-37 Ho Hao Hon Street, Ho Chi Minh City,
Vietnam. Tel.: +84-905-784-471. E-mail: thuy.lha@ou.edu.vn page: 57
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethics Statement, Sample Collection. Institutional
Ethics Board approval was obtained from the Medical
Ethics Committee of the Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh
City, Vietnam [the decision number of the permission:
516/BVCR-HDDD]. All the samples used in this study
were approved by Cho Ray Hospital and obtained from
all participants from January 2017 to December 2018. The
patients enrolled in this study were required to sign consent
forms to approve the usage of the samples for laboratory
studies and analyses.
A total of 93 archived NPC biopsy tissues that were
confirmed by immunohistochemistry, were obtained from
the Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Notable
clinicopathological characteristics, including patients’ gender,
age, and histological type were recorded. One hundred
non cancerous swab samples were collected from volunteers.
In brief, a 15 cm-long cotton stick was inserted into
the nasal cavity and moved toward the nasopharyngeal
wall; it was then swept over the surface of the posterior
and lateral nasopharyngeal wall. The cotton stick was withdrawn
and immediately immersed in phosphate-buffered
saline stored at –20 °C for further experiments.
Nucleic Acid Isolation and Bisulfite Modification.
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol™ Reagent (Cat:
15596026; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA,
USA). cDNA was reverse-transcribed from using ~1 μg
isolated RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse
Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). The
reverse-transcription assay was performed according to
according to the manufacturer’s guideline.
Total of genomic DNA was isolated from biopsy and
swab samples by the phenol/chloroform method. Then, total
genomic DNA was isolated and purified using standard
phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitation. The bisulfite
conversion of 500 ng purified DNA was performed using
EpiJET Bisulfite Conversion Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific
Inc.). The final precipitation was eluted in a volume of 20
μL and stored at –20 °C for further studies.
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and
Nested-Methylation-Specific Polymerase Chain
Reaction. For evaluation of LMP-1 expression, quantitative
polymerase chain reactions (qPCRs) were done by means
of a qSYBR-green and the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene was used as an endogenous
control. The internal control candidate was used to normalize
the cycle threshold (Ct) values of each LMP-1. The primers,
which were used in the current study, were obtained by
the previous studies and are shown in Table 1 [16,18,19].
The methylation status of the E-cadherin gene promoter
in the clinical samples was examined by two-stage nestedmethylation-
specific PCR (nested-MSP). The primers of
stage 1 and stage 2 PCR are shown in Table 1. The primers
of stage 1 PCR were used for preceding amplification that
recognize the bisulfite-modified template, and notably, do
not discriminate between methylated and un-methylated sequences. In stage 2 PCR, two pairs of primer were used
to amplify the regions of interest. One pair recognized a
sequence in which CpG sites were methylated (unmodified
by bisulfite treatment). Another pair recognized a sequence
in which CpG sites were unmethylated (modified to UpG
treatment). Each stage of PCR was performed in a total of
15 μL containing 3 μL bisulfite-modified template DNA (in
case of stage 1 PCR) or 3 μL stage 1 PCR product (in case
of stage 2 PCR), 0.75 unit iTaq DNA polymerase (Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), 0.5 μM each primer, 7.5
μL MyTaqTM Mix (Bioline Reagents Ltd., London, UK).
Thermal cycling was initiated at 95 °C for 5 min., followed
by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 seconds, annealing
at X °C for 30 seconds, extension at 72 °C for 30
seconds, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. (X °C was
the specific annealing temperature for each primer, shown
in Table 1). Finally, the methylated and unmethylated PCR
products were separated on 2.0% agarose gel and visualized
by ethidium bromide staining. Representative nested-MSP
products were sequencing to confirm the specificity of primers,
examine the efficiency of bisulfite modification and the
hypermethylation status of target gene.
Statistical Analyses. Statistical analyses were performed
by Medcalc® Version 12.7.0.0 (MedCalc Software
bv, Ostend, Belgium). The average frequency of methylation
and LMP-1 expression was calculated. The χ2 test was
used to determine the association between the expression
of LMP-1, E-cadherin methylation and NPC status.
Moreover, the association between hypermethylation of
E-cadherin, expression of LMP-1 and risk of cervical cancer
was estimated by computing the odds ratio (OR) and
95% confidence interval (CI).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|