
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GENES
ASSOCIATED WITH OBESITY IN HUMANS
USING BIOINFORMATIC DATA AND TOOLS Musliji ZS1, Pollozhani AK1, Lisichkov K2, Deligios M3, Popovski ZT2,4,* *Corresponding Author: Professor Zoran T. Popovski, Ph.D., Department of Biochemistry and
Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Bld “Aleksandar Makedonski,” bb
PB 297, 1000 Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia. Tel: +389-70-252-731. Fax: +389-2-3134-310.
E-mail: zoran_ popovski@yahoo.com page: 35
|
INTRODUCTION
Obesity is becoming a major global challenge for
humanity. It is expected that in one decade, 38.0% of adults
around the world will be overweight, if the current growth
rate continues [1]. Obesity occurs because of an unbalanced
intake of energy. This imbalance contributes to the
occurrence of many chronic diseases such as cardiovascular,
diabetes, musculoskeletal disorders, and several types
of malignant diseases [2-4].
Obesity is multifactorial. In addition to the non genetic
factors, such as nutritional habits and physical inactivity,
genetic factors and genetic predisposition play a significant
role [2,5,6]. So far, 127 genetic loci have been studied
that have a potential link to overweight and obesity [1,4].
Despite many attempts to find a solution to this phenomenon
and to reduce the number of people suffering
from these diseases, the long-term solution is still being
investigated. The development of obesity as a phenomenon
is complex [7] and has not been fully understood.
Prevention, as a promising strategy for dealing with
this disease, can be achieved by better understanding and
controlling of the factors that lead to its manifestation. The
analysis and characterization of genetic factors associated
with obesity is therefore particularly important.
In the last two decades, various tools have been developed
to research, collect data, analyze, and better understand
genetic factors. One way of gene analysis is through
bioinformatic tools. Bioinformatics is a modern scientific
discipline that combines computer science and molecular
biology. Bioinformatic tools analyze proteins and nucleic
acids, i.e., genes and gene products using computer algorithms
and appropriate databases [8].
Due to the ability to quickly analyze biological data,
bioinformatics has become an immensely popular and useful
field. Specifically, it enables the analysis of biological data such as DNA, RNA, amino acid sequence of proteins,
identification of various characteristics and molecular interactions,
prediction of 3D structures, etc. All this can be done
with tools that are widely available to potential users [9].
Osman et al. [4] has recently performed a bioinformatic
analysis of the single nucleotide polymorphisms
(SNP) of the human FTO gene (fat and obesity gene) and
suggested that the use of in silico analysis may be a good
approach to targeting SNPs in other genes associated with
the appearance of overweight and obesity. Appa Rao et
al. [7] has also used bioinformatic tools to analyze the
genes involved in diabetes-related obesity. A similar study
was conducted by Abdella [10], which concluded that this
method of analysis was useful for further studies related
to therapeutic and preventive findings for certain diseases.
In this study, using online bioinformatic tools, data related
to the FTO, PPARG (peroxisome proliferator activated
receptor γ), ADRB3 (adrenergic receptor β 3) and FABP2
(fatty acid binding protein 2) genes, which have been associated
with obesity in humans, were collected and analyzed.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|