PPARγ GENE AND ATHEROSCLEROSIS: GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS, EPIGENETICS AND THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS
Grbić E, Peterlin A, Kunej T, Petrovič D
*Corresponding Author: Professor Daniel Petrovič, M.D., Ph.D., Institute of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine University Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia. Tel: +386-1-5437-360. Fax: +386-1-5437-361. E-mail: Daniel.petrovic@mf.uni-lj.si
page: 39

INTRODUCTION

Atherosclerosis is a long-term process characterized by plaque formation in middle and large arterial blood vessels [1]. Atherosclerosis is one of the leading causes of stroke, heart attack and peripheral arterial disease [2,3]. The prevalence and degree of atherosclerosis increases with increasing age, body mass index (BMI), increased blood pressure (BP), and serum total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [4]. An elevated level of LDL is directly associated with development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) [5]. According to the National Hearth, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) data, atherosclerosis begins when certain factors such as smoking, high cholesterol, high BP and high blood sugar levels due to insulin resistance or diabetes damage the inner layers of the arteries. Other factors that have a significant effect on the development of atherosclerosis include family history, older age, unhealthy diet, lack of physical activity [2]. Depending on the position and size of the atherosclerotic plaque, microvascular and macrovascular complications of atherosclerosis can seriously damage the brain, heart, kidneys and other organs. Atherosclerotic disease of the carotid and coronary arteries appears to be highly prevalent in the ageing population [5]. Coronary atherosclerosis is the leading cause of coronary artery disease (CAD) [6]. Three pathological processes affect the formation of plaque: inflammatory reaction, cell proliferation and differentiation of foam cells [7]. The preliminary step in the formation of plaque is the passage of monocytes into subendothelial space and their differentiation into macrophages, which favor the oxidation of LDL particles in the blood and their endocytosis in the cells [8,9]. Endocytosis is mediated by scavenger receptors, which are not inhibited by content of cell cholesterol, that results in the accumulation of lipids in macrophages and foam cells. Activated macrophages secrete inflammatory cytokines [macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin 1 (IL-1)] that trigger inflammatory processes and lead to proliferation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Then, macrophages and foam cells necrotize that leads to the release of the contents into the extracellular space, which is the basis for the onset of atherosclerosis [8]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) modulate many aspects of these processes [8,9]. The aim of this review was to discuss the relationship between the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) gene polymorphisms and macrovascular complications of carotid and coronary arteries in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Moreover, we discussed epigenetic mechanisms affecting the onset of atherosclerosis and therapeutic possibilities affecting epigenetic mechanisms in order to prevent the onset and progression of atherosclerosis. The PPARγ and Its Role in the Development of Atherosclerosis. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are members of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily of transcription factors that are encoded by three PPAR genes: PPARα, PPARβ/δ and PPARγ. The PPARγ gene has two isoforms of PPARγ1 and PPARγ2 that are ligand-activating transcription factors [8]. The PPARγ gene is most prevalent in fatty tissue and macrophages and is very important in regulation of gene expression in metabolism and inflammation [10]. The PPARγ transcriptional activity was modulated by binding of numerous fatty acid metabolites that activate PPARγ. Activated PPARγ increases the expression of the scavenger receptor, which transmits ox-LDL from blood to macrophages, which then differentiates into foam cells [11,12]. By collecting foam cells, necrotic tissue residues, migrating and proliferating VSMCs (vascular smooth muscle cells), an atheromatous plaque is formed [13]. Overweight patients, T2DM patients and non diabetic patients, have increased PPARγ (γ1 and γ2) values, associated with changes in BMI and fasting insulin. Deviations from PPARγ values indicate a possible role in the onset of insulin resistance of skeletal muscles in obesity and diabetes [9]. Thus, PPARγ is involved in the regulation of all the steps that precede the onset of atheromatous plaque, therefore, the occurrence of mutations in PPARγ might be an initial step for the onset of atherosclerosis. Polymorphisms of the PPARγ Gene, Genetic Biomarkers for Atherosclerosis. Several studies have shown an association between the PPARγ polymorphisms and microvascular and macrovascular complications of coronary and carotid arteries in patients with T2DM [13-15]. In a study with a relatively small number of subjects (161) and a relatively young average lifespan (38.0 ± 15.3), Al-Shali et al. [13] found a link between PPARγ genotypes and carotid atherosclerosis. They measured the thickness of carotid intima media (IMT) and total plaque volume (TPV), and found that subjects with the PPARG A12 allele had lower IMT (0.72 ± 0.03 mm; p = 0.0045), without differences in TPV, and subjects with the PPARG c.1431T allele have higher TPV (124.0 ± 18.4; p = 0.0079) without differences in IMT [13]. According to Li et al. [16], the Pro12Ala polymorphism modulates PPARγ activity and leads to changes in the regulation of insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance that ultimately leads to ASCVD [allelic model: odds ratio (OR) 0.80; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.66-0.98, p = 0.040; dominant model: OR 0.74, 95% CI; 0.58-0.95, p = 0.033). In their meta-analysis, 12 case-control studies (eight Caucasian, three Asian and one African) were included with 10,189 cases with ASCVD [myocardial infarction (MI), CAD and acute coronary syndrome (ACS)] and 17,899 control subjects [17]. Yan et al. [17] found that the CC genotype of the C16T polymorphism (rs3856806) was associated with carotid lesions, while the CT+TT genotype had a protective role, indicating the important role of the C161T polymorphism in carotid artery atherosclerosis. In the carotid artery of patients with metabolic syndrome, CC genotype vs. CT+TT genotype significantly increased IMT and plaque index (IMT: 0.84 ± 0.3 mm; plaque index: 2.19 ± 1.21; p <0.05) [18]. In a study on Thai subjects, Yongsakulchai et al. [12] found that the combination of PPARγ polymorphisms rs3856806 (C1431T), rs8192678 (G482S) and liver X receptor-α (LXRα) polymorphism rs12221497 (115G/A) predict the development and progression of coronary atherosclerosis in subjects at-risk for CAD, and that the central role in this process belongs to rs8192678 polymorphism (OR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.01 ± 2.66, p: 0.048). In their study, 387 subjects were included, aged between 35-85 years, of whom 225 had CAD and 162 non CAD subjects (CAD group = stenosis ≥50.0% and non CAD group = stenosis ≤50.0%, at least one of the major coronary arteries) [12]. Few studies have shown that there was no statistically significant relationship between PPARγ polymorphisms and atherosclerosis[18-20]. Wang et al. [18] in a metaanalysis involving 29 studies (15 Caucasian, 13 Asian and one African), with PPARγ polymorphisms rs1801282 (Pro12Ala)/ rs3856806 (C161T), did not find a statistically significant relationship with the onset of atherosclerotic diseases. In their meta-analysis, they analyzed different genetic models and associations with atherosclerotic disorders, there were no statistically significant results for the polymorphism rs1801282 [18]. However, for the polymorphism rs3856806, based on ethnicity, they found a significantly increased risk for ath-erosclerotic disease in Caucasians (2679 cases with atherosclerotic disease and 5121 control subjects) for the additive model (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.12-2.66) and for the recessive model (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.11-2.62), whereas the risk for the Asian population (1910 cases with atherosclerotic disease and 1820 control subjects) was reduced, for the dominant model (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.62-0.81) and for the recessive model (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.84). Moreover, based on ethnicity, in the subgroup with MI: they reported an association for rs3856806 for the additive model (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.10-6.54) and for the recessive model (OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.09-6.10), whereas for CAD they found a decreased risk for the additive model (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51-0.88) and for the dominant model (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.61-0.79) [18]. In the Korean Population Study, they did not find any statistically significant association between Pro12Ala polymorphism and CVD development (p = 0.824). In their prospective study, 267 subjects were included, divided into four groups, in the number of stenotic coronary arteries, the values of stenosis ≥50.% were considered significant. The percentage of patients with normal arterial lumen was 43.8%; 33.0% of patients had a stenosis of one coronary artery, 14.6% had a stenosis in two coronary arteries, and 8.6% had a stenosis of three coronary arteries [19]. Similarly, Wan et al. [20] reported that there was a significant link between the C161T genotype and the vessels disease in a group of Chinese patients with CAD and T2DM (OR 1.22; 95% CI: 1.03-1.45, p = 0.019), but that there was no significant association with CAD risk (p = 0.695). In their study, a group of patients (CAD+T2DM) with CC genotype (70.3%) had severe stenosis >75.0% of one of the major coronary arteries. Moreover, they discovered that the C161T polymorphism was associated with adipose metabolism, which suggests that by modulating it, the risk of atherogenesis could be reduced in the group of patients with CAD and T2DM [20]. Epigenetics. So far, no study has reported about epigenetics of PPARγ in atherosclerosis in humans. However, epigenetic mechanisms have been implicated in the onset of atherosclerosis [21-23]. Previous research has shown a significant effect of epigenetic factors on gene expression, affecting adhesion, migration, differentiation of leukocytes, proliferation and migration of VSMCs, or all key processes in the onset and development of atherosclerosis. In addition to direct changes to human DNA, there are three other important epigenetic pathways that are important for the regulation of gene expression, which are DNA methylation, histone posttranslational modification and RNA-based mechanisms [21]. DNA methylation represents the covalent binding of the methyl group to the 5’ position of the cytosine, and plays a very important role in the organization of chromatin and in that way, leads to the silencing of certain genes, the complex formed is called 5’ methyl-cytosine [24]. Key role in DNA methylation, which is mainly related to the CpG region, is played by three methyl transferases (DNMT1, DNMT3a and DNMT3b) with the S-adenosyl methionine donor of the methyl group [24]. The exact mechanism of the development of atherosclerosis by changes in DNA methylation is not fully known, but many studies of highfat diet-fed apoE null mice, human SMCs, and ballooninjured rabbit have shown a link between hypomethylation with the onset of atherosclerosis [24-26]. In these studies, hypomethylation was associated with increased expression of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) in atherosclerotic lesions, removal of the methyl group increases the transcription activity. Migration and proliferation of VSMC are the central axis in the development of atherosclerosis [25]. Lund et al. [27], showed in a study with ApoE null mice that changes in DNA methylation profiles might be markers of atherosclerosis in diabetics. The four classes of histones (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4) form an octameric complex, with two copies of each of these four histones, and 147 bp chromosomal DNA wrapped on octameric complex, forming the onset and functional unit of chromatin nucleosomes. Cell DNA is packaged in chromatin [28]. The unstructured N-terminal “tail” histone is subject to numerous modifications such as acetylation, methylation and phosphorylation [28]. The most common histone modification is acetylation. With the enzyme histone acetyltransferase (HATs) and histone deacetylase (HDACs), gene transcription activity is monitored, HATs add the acetyl group to the histone tail, thereby activating the gene, and HDACs inhibiting, removing the acetyl group [29]. Many studies show the relationship between acetylation and deacetylation status and atherosclerosis [25,30]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor induces the expression of the nuclear receptor in macrophages (LXRα), which increases the expression of ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily A Member 1 (ABCA1) (a member of the ABC transporter protein family) leading to the elimination of cholesterol from the macrophage. Deacetylation of PPARγ inhibits the pathway: PPARγ, LXRα, ABCA1, which leads to the blocking of cholesterol efflux, increased production of proinflammatory macrophages and the development of an inflammatory reaction, leading to the onset and development of atherosclerosis [31,32]. According to Cao et al. [32], the HDAC9 expression is associated with the onset of atherosclerotic plaques in the arteries, the onset of stroke, and the increased expression of macrophages acts atherogenetic. In the study with LDLr [–/–] mice, the atherogenetic effect is reduced by deletion of HDCA9, which leads to an increase in macrophage cholesterol efflux and the prevention of the formation of foam cells, and reduces the production of inflammatory cells by translating macrophages from inflammatory M1 phenotype into an antiinflammatory M2 phenotype [33]. This study demonstrates the important role of HDCA9 in the development of atherosclerosis, and the possibility of developing epigenetic therapy aimed at inhibiting HDCA9 isoforms in macrophages. The third epigenetic model, the RNA-based mechanism, is relatively new. Currently the greatest attention of scientists attracts non coding RNA (ncRNA), including small RNAs [34]. Considering the length of the fragment, we distinguished two main types of ncRNA: long ncRNA (>200 nucleotides) and short ncRNA (<200 nucleotides) and several subtypes that modulate gene expression [34]. Short RNA [i.e., microRNA (miRNA)] performs genome repression by complementary binding to the 3’ or 5’ UTR (untranslated region) of targeted mRNA, activates the miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC) through which it silences gene expression [34]. Long non coding RNA (LncRNA) has a wide range of effects in various processes from increasing to reducing gene expression in combination with other epigenetic enzymes, plays an important role in chromatin modulation, transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation, cell apoptosis, etc. [34]. MicroRNA has a leading role in the regulation of ath-erosclerotic process [35]. Previous studies of miRNA indicate a role in the prediction of certain diseases such as atherosclerosis, due to its role in protein production and the impact of one miRNA on several hundred target genes, so far about 1100 miRNA are known in humans [35]. In the study, Zhao et al. [36] point out the important role of miR-613 in blocking the signaling pathway of PPARγ, LXRα and ABCA1, which leads to the stopping of cholesterol efflux and the development of atherosclerosis. Also, indicating that activated PPARγ increases the expression of LXRα and ABCA1, through the negative control of miR-613, acting anti-atherogenetic [36]. In the Tampere Vascular Study, a significantly expression of miR- 21, miR-210, miR-34a, and miR-146a/b was reported in aortic, carotid, and femoral atherosclerotic arteries in relation to non ath-erosclerotic left internal thoracic arteries [37]. MicroRNA-21 and miRNA-34a show a significant relationship with the proliferation of VSMCs [38,39]. MicroRNA- 146a is associated with CADs and increased LDL release [39]. The levels of ox-LDL play an important role in the onset of atherosclerosis, increasing the expression of miRNA-29b. These effects are achieved by repression of DNA methyl-transferase 3 Beta (DNMT3b), which increases cellular migration of VSMC through increased regulation of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) [39]. In the study Cipollone et al. [40], a significant difference in the expression of miRNA-100, miRNA-127, miRNA-145, miRNA-133a and miRNA-133b was found in the tissue of patients with endarterectomy of the carotid and control group. In short, this study, as well as the above studies, points to the role of miRNA in the onset of atherosclerosis, and highlights the possibility of using miRNAs as biomarkers for the onset and development of atherosclerosis. Therapy. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown a positive effect of TZDs (tiazolidinediones) on the function and pharmacology of β-cells through the mechanism of mediated PPARγ, increasing the expression of PDX-1 (pancreatic duodenal homeobox) on β-cells in pre diabetics and T2DM patients [41]. Clinical studies have shown that TZDs are PPARγ agonists that reduce inflammatory reactions, modulate two ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCA1 and ABCG1) expression and inhibit key VSMC processes associated with atherosclerosis and protect blood vessels of T2DM patients [42]. Several studies have shown positive effects of TZDs (Troglitazone, Pioglitazone) in T2DM patients on intima media thickness reduction and restenosis processes in T2DM patients with stent [42-44]. On the other hand, several studies describe the opposite effect of TZDs on PPARγ, which modulates adipocyte activity and leads to metabolic disorders and heart disease such as T2DM and CAD [16,45]. So far, delivery of miR-150 may represent a potential approach to prevent macrophage foam cell formation in atherosclerosis by inhibition of the formation of macrophage foam cells through targeting adiponectin receptor 2 [46]. Also, PPARγ agonists, by activating PPARγ, increase the concentration of adiponectin in plasma and expression of AdypoR2 in macrophages, and act anti-arteriogenic [47].



Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Accepted articles (Accepted, unedited articles, published online and can be cited. The final edited and printed version of the manuscript will appear in future)
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006