
LACK OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN VARIANTS WITHIN THE
AHSG, HCRT AND NPY2R GENES AND ANTHROPOMETRICAL
PARAMETERS IN CZECH POST-MONICA STUDY Jurcikova L*, Adamkova V, Lanska V, Suchanek P, Hubacek JA *Corresponding Author: Ing. Lucie Jurčíková, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, DEM, Videnska
1958/9, Prague 4, 14021, Czech Republic; Tel.: +420-261-362-229; Fax: +420-241-721-574; E-mail: jurl@ikem.cz page: 63
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed a randomly selected representative
sample of adult individuals (1191 males and 1368
females), aged 25-64 years at the time of first examination
(Table 1). All individuals had participated in
the Czech post-MONICA study, performed according
to the World Health Organization MONICA Project
protocol, which was aligned to examine risk factors of
cardiovascular disease development, including BMI
and plasma lipids, after overnight fasting [24,25].
The subjects were examined in nine Czech districts
(Kromeriz, Chrudim, Cheb, Jindrichuv Hradec, Pardubice,
Litomerice, Plzen, Prague East, and Benesov)
in 1997/1998 and were reexamined in 2000/ 2001 and
2007/2008. For our purposes, the most recent data
(2007/2008) were used. Written informed consent was
given by all individuals. The study was approved by
the Institutional Ethics Committee and is in agreement
with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Polymorphisms were genotyped using the the
polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length
polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) (for more details see Table
2) in a total volume of 25 mL. All PCR chemicals
and restriction enzymes used were from Fermentas
International Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada. The
PCR reactions were performed on the PCR cyclers MJ
Research DYAD Disciple. Restriction fragments were
separated via horizontal electrophoresis on 10.0%
polyacrylamide gel using the MADGE platform.
To check our PCR-RFLP results, we repeated
5.0% of the samples in each polymorphism. The results
of SNPs in the AHSG, HCRT and NPY2R genes
were identical in 100.0% of cases.
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was proved by the
c2 test to confirm the independent segregation of the
alleles. Differences between genotypes were calculated
by analysis of variance (ANOVA), logarithmic
transformation was used for triglyceride levels. Mean
values ± SD were calculated, two-tailed p values of less
than 0.05 were considered to be significant (Table 3).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|