
CHROMOSOME ABNORMALITIES IN SPONTANEOUS
ABORTIONS: APPLICATION OF MULTICOLOR
FLUORESCENT IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION AND
ORIGINAL DNA PROBES FOR CHROMOSOMES
1, 9, 13, 14, 16, 18, 21, 22, X AND Y
Vorsanova SG1,*, Kirilova EA2, Yurov YB3, Kolotii AD1,
Monakhov VV3, Iourov IY3, Beresheva AK1
*Corresponding Author: : Professor Dr. Svetlana G. Vorsanova, Director of Molecular-Cytogenetic Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases, Institute of Pediatrics and Children Surgery, Russian Ministry of Health, TaldomŽskaya str 2, 127 412 Moscow, Russia; Tel.: +7-095-484-1948; Fax: +7-095-952-8940; E-mail: y_yurov@ yahoo.com page: 49
|
INTRODUCTION
Chromosomal abnormalities are known as one of the main causes of spontaneous abortions. About 15% of clinically recognized pregnancies are aborted before 20 weeks of gestation, and approximately half of these are attributed to detectable chromosome abnormalities [1]. Cytogenetic evaluations of first trimester spontaneous abortions revealed an overall incidence of chromosomal abnormalities of 50-70% [2,3]. The most common cause of a spontaneous abortions is de novo numerical abnormalities, particularly autosomal trisomies for chromosomes 13, 14, 15, 16, 21 and 22, followed by sex chromosome aneuploidies and polyploidies [3-5]. The occurrence of chromosomal abnormalities is also appreciable in spontaneous abortions after in vitro fertilization (IVF). Recent data showed that about 43% of IVF spontaneous abortions are those with chromosomal abnormalities [6]. The most common applied technique for detection of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions is analysis of metaphase chromosomes by karyotyping cultured cells. In fact, the application of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on uncultured cells has a number of advantages, and has becomes a widely used method for chromosome abnormality detection in spontaneous abortions [7-9].
We have proposed a study of chromosomal abnormalities by FISH and an original collection of DNA probes for chromosomes 1, 9, 13, 14, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y, as it is known that these chromosomes are involved in most common aneuploidies in spontaneous abortion specimens. Special attention was paid to the use of interphase FISH for identification of mosaic forms of aneuploidies, not properly investigated in spontaneous abortions up to date.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|