
UNUSUAL PATTERN OF BONE MARROW SOMATIC
MUTATION IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS REFERRED
FOR CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS
Grant SG1,*, McLoughlin RK2, Wenger SL3 *Corresponding Author: Stephen G. Grant, Ph.D., Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, 3343 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; Tel.: +412-383-2093; Fax: +412-383-2123; E-mail: sgg@pitt.edu page: 45
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients. Peripheral blood samples from patients referred for analysis by the Clinical Cytogenetics Laboratory of Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA, USA, were coded prior to being processed for the GPA assay. From a total population of 118 samples, 11 were identified as having no detectable cytogenetic abnormality (and thus were of unknown etiology), as well as being heterozygous for the MN blood group, and therefore informative for the GPA in vivo somatic mutation assay.
GPA Mutation Assay. The “DB6” version of the GPA assay was performed [1]. Briefly, blood samples from MN heterozygotes were double-labeled with monoclonal antibodies to the two forms of the GPA protein on the erythrocyte surface. Five million cells were then analyzed for allele loss phenotypes via flow cytometry.The same laboratory control, a 39-year-old male was analyzed three times in conjunction with the patient samples in this report. Total GPA Mf were 8.8, 11.6 and 11.8 x 10–6 for these analyses, which are consistent with our experience for this subject, who has been analyzed 69 other times in our laboratory, with an average Mf [ standard deviation (SD)] of 9.7 - 3.9 x 10–6. Similarly, allele loss mutations occurred at frequencies of 3.6, 4.0 and 7.8 x 10–6 in these analyses, consistent with our experience for this subject (allele loss Mf = 4.6 x 10–6); while allele loss and duplication mutants occurred at frequencies of 4.0, 5.2 and 7.6 x 10–6 , also consistent with other analyses for this individual (Mf = 5.1 x 10–6 ).
Statistical Analyses. Population comparisons were performed with the t test using Microsoft Excel on ln transformed data.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|