
POLYPLOIDY PHENOMENON AS A CAUSE OF EARLY MISCARRIAGES IN ABORTION MATERIALS Yildirim ME, Karakus S, Kurtulgan HK, Ozer L, Celik SB *Corresponding Author: Malik Ejder Yildirim, Associate Professor. Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 58104 Sivas, Turkey. Phone: 03462581085, Email: nemalik2002@gmail.com page: 5
|
RESULTS
In order to detect chromosomal abnormalities, karyotyping
was performed on 92 spontaneous abortion samples
and aCGH was applied whenever needed. The averages
of age, body mass index, gravidity, parity and miscarriage
numbers of females were calculated (Table 1). The mean age
of women with miscarriage was 27±4.43. Twelve of these
women (13%) had a history of recurrent miscarriage. There
was no growth in 23 samples (25%) due to culture failure,
while the results were normal in 42 materials (45.7%). A
total of 32 various numerical and structural chromosomal
abnormalities and chromosomal variations were found in
27 of the cases (29.3%) (Table 2). Triploidy was the most
common among them (28%) (Table 3). In terms of numerical
chromosomal abnormalities, 11 polyploidy cases (2 tetraploids
and 9 triploids) were found as well as 8 trisomies
(one of which was mosaic) and 2 sex chromosome aneuploidies
(monosomy X) in our study. Trisomies included
chromosomes 9, 13, 15 (two cases), 16 (two cases), 18,
and chromosome 2 as mosaic. We detected 4 translocations
as structural chromosomal abnormalities. Translocations
consisted of two t(9;18), one t(1;7) and one t(7;11). On the
other hand, the short arm isochromosome of chromosome 6
was found in one of the cases, while another case had a deletion
of the long arm of the X chromosome and both abnormalities
were mosaic. Among the numerical and structural
chromosomal abnormalities, the rate of polyploidy was the
highest (40.7%) (Figure 1). No abnormalities were detected
in the karyotype analysis of the parents of polyploidy cases.
We found 5 chromosomal variations (two heterochromatin
and two satellite increments and inv9) in abortion materials.
Although there was no significant difference in terms
of maternal age, we determined a higher paternal age in
polyploidy cases than in abortions with normal karyotype.
(31.2±6.4 versus 34.6±4.8 and p=0.002).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|