
POLYPLOIDY PHENOMENON AS A CAUSE OF EARLY MISCARRIAGES IN ABORTION MATERIALS Yildirim ME, Karakus S, Kurtulgan HK, Ozer L, Celik SB *Corresponding Author: Malik Ejder Yildirim, Associate Professor. Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 58104 Sivas, Turkey. Phone: 03462581085, Email: nemalik2002@gmail.com page: 5
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample selection
After a comprehensive anamnesis for each case, ninety
two abortion materials were included in this research
and all were first trimester miscarriages. Samples were
collected at Cumhuriyet University Research Hospital
between 2017 and 2021. The study complies with the Helsinki
Declaration and it was approved by the Ethics Committee
of Cumhuriyet University. Informed consent was
obtained from the families. The mean age of the females
participating in the study was calculated.
Laboratory analysis
For the examination of abortion materials, separate
cultures were prepared by placing the sample into two
flasks, one containing a half Chang D and another with
Amniomax which were then left to incubate in a CO2
incubator at 37 °C. When there was sufficient growth,
60 μL colchicine were added for every 5mL of culture,
for 45 minutes. The growth medium was then removed
and a fixative solution was added for 10 minutes at room
temperature. This step was repeated twice and then the
plates were prepared as usual and stained by G band. Captured
cells by a computerized system (Applied Imaging,
USA) were analyzed and karyotyped in the metaphase
stage. The results were defined according to the International
System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature
(ISCN). A few cases with a family history of translocation
or inadequate karyotype analysis were subsequently
analyzed with aCGH for confirmation.
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS program,
version 22.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). For the
evaluation of the data, descriptive statistical criteria such as
frequency, mean and standard deviation were chosen. The
Independent Sample T test was used to compare the means.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|