
CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE RISK
AND SMOKING CESSATION CHANGES INDUCED
BY CHRNA5-A3 AND CHRNB3-A6 VARIATION
IN A CHINESE MALE POPULATION Zhao L1,, Zou L-Y2,, Cheng B-F3, Yu X-J4, Zou J-H5,*, Han W6,* *Corresponding Author: Dr. Wei Han, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Qingdao Municipal Hospital,
Qingdao University, No. 5 Donghai Mid Road, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China. Tel: +86-185-
6185-7838. E-mail: sallyhan1@163.com. And: Dr. Jian-Hong Zou, Center of Diseases Control of Qingdao
Shi-Bei District, No. 3 Deping Road, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China. Tel: +86-185-6185-7599.
E-mail: 277517366@qq.com
-Long Zhao, Ling-Yan Zou contributed equally to this study. page: 51
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Research Participants. From January 2017 to May
2018, we recruited patients admitted to the Second Ward
of Respiratory Department of Qingdao Municipal Hospital,
Qingdao, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of
China (PRC). The study consisting of 823 male smokers
with COPD (407 patients with COPD who failed to quit
smoking and 416 non smokers with COPD ≥1 year) and
435 healthy male smokers as control subjects. All subjects
were recruited from the Smoking Cessation Clinic and the
Medical Examination Department of Qingdao Municipal
Hospital. Demographic information, including age, body
mass index (BMI), and detailed circumstances of smoking,
was collected in interviews conducted by trained medical
doctors. Those smoking at least 20 packs in their life, or
smoking at least one cigarette a day for more than 1 year
were classified a smokers, non smokers were classified
as having quit smoking ≥1 year. Smoking COPD subjects
meet the following criteria: for those who still smoke or
have quit smoking, physician-diagnosed COPD, pulmonary
function test showing post-bronchodilator forced
expiratory volume (FEV) in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital
capacity (FVC) of less than 70.0% and FEV1 of less
than 80.0% predicted in the Global Initiative for COPD
2015 (GOLD 2015; https://glodcopd/org/). Subject exclusion
criteria: definite diagnosis of lung cancer, asthma or
smoking-related cancer. Cases were matched according to
age, BMI and smoking history. The study was approved by
Qingdao Municipal Hospital Ethics Committee (approval
number: KYLL2010058). All patients participating in the
program signed an informed consent form.
Analysis. Blood samples of all participants were collected.
Using the DNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech
Co. Ltd., Beijing, PRC) to extract the genomic DNA of
the subjects. Genotyping was carried out commercially
using Sequenom MassARRAY® via Beijing Genomic
Institute (BGI) (Shenzhen, PRC) [13]. In order to ensure
the repeatability and consistency of the test, we randomly
selected 5.0% of the samples for a second test. In addition,
in order to further verify the accuracy of the BGI results,
we also genotyped some samples by direct sequencing or
restriction enzyme digestion.
Statistical Analysis. The t-test was used to confirm
the difference in population characteristics and gene distribution
between the experimental group and the control
group. The χ2 test was used to compare the demographic
characteristics of the case group and the control group. The
correlation between each SNP and the risk of smoking and
nicotine-dependence in COPD patients was evaluated by
a logistic regression model, which adjusted the age, BMI,
current smoking status and the number of packages per
year for long-term smokers. Age, BMI, current smoking
status and pack-years of the number of cigarettes smoked
per year, including those who quit and those who are currently
smoking, were analyzed in a hierarchical manner
to assess whether there was any difference between these
subgroups. All statistical analyses adopted a two-sided test,
and a p value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically
significant. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
(SPSS) version 22 (IBM® SPSS; www.ibm.com/SPSSStatistics/)
was used for all statistical analysis.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|