
DETECTING EGFR MUTATIONS IN PATIENTS
WITH NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER Hammoudeh ZA, Antonova O, Staneva R, Nikolova D, Kyuchukov Y,
Penev A, Mintchev T, Koleva V, Hadjidekova S, Toncheva D *Corresponding Author: Zora A. Hammoudeh, Molecular Biologist, Department of Medical Genetics, Medical University Sofia,
2 Zdrave Str., 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria. Tel: +359-2-917-2735. Mobile: +359-88-943-0505. E-mail: zorahammoudeh@yahoo.com page: 13
|
INTRODUCTION
In Bulgaria, lung cancer is a major health problem;
it is more frequent in men than in women and most of
the patients are diagnosed when they are in an advanced
stage. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most
common form of lung cancer (85.0% of the cases) and it
is the leading cause of death for male and female patients.
As reported by the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry,
NSCLC is the most common malignancy in men (19.1%)
and the seventh in women (5.1%) [1,2]. Patients with
NSCLC must be tested for prognostic markers associated
with the survival of the patient and predictive biomarkers
associated with the effect of the therapeutics. The target
therapy contributes to the therapeutic approach according
to specific genetic abnormalities in the tumor tissue. A
lot of genes with predictive and prognostic significance
in NSCLC are involved in the signaling pathway EGFR/
KRAS/RAF/ MEK/MEK/ERK [3]. The epidermal growth
factor receptor (EGFR) gene encodes a protein that is a
transmembrane glycoprotein, a member of the protein
kinase family. The receptor for members of the EGFR
family, has three domains: extracellular, trans membrane
and intracellular. When the ligand is attached to the receptor
a cascade is induced, tyrosine is autophosphorylated
and the activity of tyrosine kinase is increased. The Ras/
Raf/MEK/ERK cascade transmits signals to transcription
factors, which regulate gene expression and the activity
of proteins involved in apoptosis. Mutations in the EGFR
gene lead to over expression of the protein and had been
associated with development of lung cancer, especially
NSCLC. Sensitive mutations in the EGFR gene, such
as mutations, deletions in exon 19, and the point mutation
L858R in exon 21, have been reported in 80.0% of
cases. They are found in 10.0-15.0% of the patients with
adenocarcinomas and only 3.0% of other histological types. In advanced NSCLC, the presence of an activating
mutation in EGFR gene confers better prognosis and
predicts the sensitivity of tumor cells to EGFR tyrosine
kinase inhibitors (TKIs) [4,5]. In Bulgaria, it is recommended
that patients with adenocarcinoma be tested for
the EGFR gene mutations, so they can be given EGFR
TKI as a first-line therapy instead of chemotherapy. The
mutations, deletion in exon 19 and L858R in exon 21 in
the EGFR gene are associated with sensitivity to TKIs
such as gefitinib [6]. Both mutations show increased
sensitivity to first generation EGFR TKIs and they are
the most frequent mutations in NSCLC [7]. Overall, mutations
in the EGFR gene are more frequent in tumors
classified as adenocarcinoma, in female patients who
have never smoked. Therefore, those patients have the
highest response rates to gefitinib [8,9].
Many molecular technologies are used in the diagnostic
laboratories for the evaluation of the EGFR gene mutations.
In this series of samples from Bulgarian NSCLC
patients, we applied a real-time polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR) analysis of DNA extracted from formalin-fixed
paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE).
We present our data for the EGFR gene mutations,
using RT-PCR kit (therascreen EGFR RGQ PCR kit)
amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) and
Scorpions therascreenŽ EGFR test; Qiagen Ltd., Manchester,
Greater Manchester, UK). The kit is optimized
for in vitro diagnostics and detects the following mutations
in the EGFR gene: exon 19 deletions, L858R,
L861Q, G719X, S768I, exon 20 insertions, and the point
mutation T790M.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|