
PREVALENCE OF CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES
IN INFERTILE COUPLES IN ROMANIA Mierla D1,*, Malageanu M1, Tulin R1,2, Albu D1,2 *Corresponding Author: Dana Mierla, PhD, Department of Genetics, Life Memorial Hospital, Grivita Street,
Bucharest, Romania. Tel: +40-72-147-9083. E-mail: dana_mierla@yahoo.com page: 23
|
RESULTS
One thousand, two hundred and thirty-one infertile
men were investigated by classical cytogenetic
techniques. Of these, 700 men presented with aligoasthenoteratozoospermia
(OATS), 150 azoospermia,
50 oligozoospermia, 10 oligoteratozoospermia, 21
oligoasthenospermia and 300 with normospermia.
The control group consisted of 35 fertile men with
one or more children. The chromosomal abnormalities
identified in the control group and the study group
are presented in Table 2.
The male factor is responsible for approximately
40.0% of infertility cases [18]. Chromosomal abnormalities
are an important cause of male infertility. The
incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in infertile
men was 2.52%, of which 1.38% were autosomal abnormalities
and 1.14% sex chromosomal abnormalities.
No chromosomal abnormalities were identified
in the control group (Table 2).
A total of 964 women with reproductive problems
were investigated by classical cytogenetic techniques.
Three hundred and fifty had one previous
miscarriage, 300 had two miscarriages, 150 had three
or more miscarriages and 164 had a history of sterility
or abortive disease. The control group consisted
of 52 fertile women with one or more children. The
chromosomal abnormalities identified in the two
groups are presented in Table 3. The incidence of
chromosomal abnormalities in our group was 2.49%,
of which 1.87% were autosomal abnormalities and 0.62% sex chromosomal abnormalities. The incidence
of chromosomal abnormalities in the control
group was 1.92% (autosomal abnormalities.
Numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities
identified in infertile patients are presented
in Tables 4 and 5. In this study, we did a correlation
between the incidence of chromosomal anomalies
identified in infertile men compared to infertile women
and found that there was no statistical significance
(Table 6). Cytogenetic analysis revealed a number of
chromosomal polymorphisms, considered as normal
chromosomal variations, but they have not been investigated
in this study.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|