
INDIVIDUAL PHENOTYPE TRAIT VARIABILITY
AS GENETIC MARKERS OF GENDER SUSCEPTIBILITY
TO SPINA BIFIDA Nikolic DP1,*, Cvjeticanin S2,3, Petronic I1,2, Brdar R2,4,
Cirovic D1,2, Bizic M4, Milincic Z1,2, Karan R5 *Corresponding Author: Dejan P. Nikolic, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Children’s Hospital,
Nikole Stefanovica 3, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; Tel.: +38-1-638-133-345; Email: denikol27@yahoo.com page: 11
|
DISCUSSION
Our findings indicate a difference in individual
trait variability between males and females for the predisposition to SB and to the expression of SB (SBO
or SBA). A difference in genetic variability between
healthy individuals and those with a diagnosed SB was
reported by Nikolic et al. [19], but the possible role
of gender for the SB individuals has not yet been observed
regarding the individual traits variability.
The present variability in the proportion of certain
observed traits between genders in the control
groups have been noticed in previous studies as well.
For example, in the study of Ziering and Krenitzky
[20], frequent opposite hair whorl orientation was observed
in the male population. Reiss and Reiss [21]
have presented that left-handedness was more frequent
in males, while in the study of Gillam et al. [22], a
longer index finger than the ring finger was frequently
recorded in the female population.
Our findings clearly show that there are differences
in the distribution of certain phenotype traits
between genders in control groups and in SBO and SBA patients, giving us the assumption of different
predisposition to SBO and SBA between genders and
the possibility of a correlation with different combinations
of polygenes in these subjects. Such differences,
stress the possibility of different, more specific phenotype
existence for SBO or SBA regarding gender.
From this point of view, it could be assumed that certain
genes determining observed phenotypes that differ
remarkably between genders in these subjects could
have influence, to a certain degree, on the adaptability
potential of the organism with the present SBO or
SBA, to the specific environmental factors that could
interfere during embryo genesis processes [14]. Since
the genes for evaluated HRT are located on different
chromosomes, they are considered not just the markers
of such chromosomes, but the markers of the groups
of surrounding polygenes that may have influence to a
different degree on the development of SB and expression
of SBO or SBA.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|