
MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF
HEMOPHILIA A IN SOUTHEAST BULGARIA Sukarova Stefanovska E1, Tchakarova P2, Petkov GH2, Efremov GD1,* *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Georgi D. Efremov, Research Centre for Genetic Engineering
and Biotechnology, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Bul. Krste Misirkov 2,
POB 428, Skopje 1000, Republic of Macedonia; Tel.: +389-2-3235-411; Fax: +389-2-3115-434;E-mail: gde@manu.edu.mk page: 55
|
INTRODUCTION
Hemophilia A is a common X-linked bleeding disorder affecting 1/5,000 males worldwide [1]. It is caused by mutations in the factor VIII (FVIII) gene, leading to a deficiency of, or to a dysfunctional FVIII, an essential cofactor in the factor X activation complex. This gene consists of 26 exons (approximately 9 kb mRNA) and encodes a 2,351 amino acid precursor protein. This comprises of a leader peptide, three A domains, a B domain and two C domains. The A domains are flanked by small acidic regions (a1-3) in the sequence: A1-a1-A2-a2- B-a3-A3-C1-C2 [2]. During secretion, circulation in plasma and activation of the precursor protein undergoes a series of cleavages that result in the active heterotrimeric FVIII [3]. Factor VIII deficiency is heterogeneous in clinical severity and at the molecular level. The most common molecular defect is an intron 22 inversion which occurs in up to 45% of severely hemophilic patients. This is caused by recombination between a sequence within intron 22 of the FVIII gene and one of the two homologous regions telomeric to the gene [4]. Another recurrent mutation is the intron 1 inversion which has a frequency of up to 5% of molecular defects detected in hemophilic patients of different ethnic groups [5]. Other mutations 56 are mainly single nucleotide substitutions spread throughout the coding region of the gene, and are peculiar to the individual families [6]. A comprehensive FVIII mutation database and sequence resource site (HAMSTeRS) is available at http:// europium. csc.mrc.ac.uk. Knowledge of the causative molecular defect has become an important tool in hemophilia care with respect to prediction of the clinical course and safe genetic counseling of relatives.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|