
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL MOTOR
NEURON AND NEURONAL APOPTOSIS INHIBITORY
PROTEIN GENES IN MACEDONIAN SPINAL
MUSCULAR ATROPHY PATIENTS Kocheva SA1,2, Vlaski-Jekic S3, Kuturec M2, Efremov GD1,* *Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Georgi D. Efremov, Macedonian Academy of Sciences
and Arts, Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aven Krste Misirkov 2,
POB 428, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel: +389-2-3235411; Fax: +389-2-3115434;
E-mail: gde@manu.edu page: 55
|
DISCUSSION
Our study of the molecular basis of SMA showed a frequency for SMN gene deletions in Macedonian patients of 77.0% (94.1% in type I, 87.5% in type II). Deletions involving both exons 7 and 8 (82.6%) was much more frequent than deletions of exon 7 only (17.4%). Our data support the hypothesis that the telomeric SMN gene may play a major role in determining the clinical severety of SMA [11-18,26-30]. Deletion of exon 5 of the NAIP gene was detected in 27.0% of SMA patients and in 6.7% par ents. A higher frequency of deletions in the NAIP gene was found in SMA type I (41.2%) than SMA type II (11.1%) patients. Deletion in exon 5 of NAIP, which is specific for the functional NAIP gene, shows wide frequency variation (0-67%) in different population studies [9-18]. The observation that deletions involving both SMN and NAIP genes are more frequently observed in SMA type I than SMA type II or SMA type III, suggests a correlation between the extent of the deletion and the severity of the phenotype. However, the fact that a great proportion of severely affected patients (41.2%) presented no deletions in the NAIP gene supports the hypothesis that in addition to the extent of the deletion, other factors may regulate the severity of the clinical course. A relationship between the number of gene copies and the disease pheno type has been suggested [19,20]. Deletions of one or both of exon 5 of the NAIP gene is not sufficient to cause the disease. Patients with no detectable deletion in exons 7 and 8 of the SMN gene could be due to deletions or point mutations in the promotor or in exons under investiga-tion or could not be identified under these analytical conditions.
In summary, our data confirm the view that SMA is associated with a high frequency of deletions in the 5q13 chromosome region, and indicate that the more severe phenotype is associated with more extensive deletions. They also support the hypothesis that the telomeric SMN gene may play a major role in determining the clinical severity of SMA, while the NAIP gene has a modifying effect on the phenotype. Deletion screening in exons 7 and 8 of the SMNtel gene has become an important diagnostic tool in infantile SMA. DNA analysis is useful in confirm ing the clinical diagnosis of SMA and for prenatal predic tion in SMA families.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|