
CAG REPEAT POLYMORPHISM OF THE MITOCHONDRIAL
DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA GENE IN MACEDONIAN
INFERTILE AND FERTILE MEN Plaseski T1,2, Noveski P1, Dimitrovski C2, Efremov GD1,
Plaseska-Karanfilska D1 *Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Dr. Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts,
Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Av. Krste Misirkov 2, POB 428, 1000
Skopje, R. Macedonia; Tel.: +389-2-3235-410; Fax: +389-2-3115-434; E-mail: dijana@manu.edu.mk page: 37
|
RESULTS
Six different alleles that contained from 7 to 12 CAG repeats were detected in the 696 alleles studied (Table 1). The most frequently observed POLG allele was the com mon allele of 10 CAG repeats with a frequency of 87.6% in the infertile/subfertile group and 86.6% in the control group of fertile males. The frequency of the allele of 10 CAG repeats was similar in all five subgroups of infer tile/subfertile patients ranging from 85.1% in the azoosper mia group to 90.2% in the severe oligozoospermia group. The second most frequent allele contained 11 CAG repeats, ranging from 8.0% in severe oligozoospermia group to 11.5% in the azoospermia group. The other four POLG CAG alleles were extremely rare.

Figure 2. Distribution of POLG CAG genotypes in different groups of infertile/subfertile patients and fertile controls.
The frequency of the different POLG CAG genotypes is given in Table 2. The most frequent genotype was the 10/10, 76.9% in the patient group, 74.8% in the control group. This genotype was designated as a homozygous wild type [3]. Five heterozygous genotypes (7/10, 8/10, 9/10, 11/10, 12/10) and two homozygous mutant geno types (9/11 and 11/11) were also found. The distribution of the 10/10, 10/not10 and not10/not10 genotypes is shown in Figure 2. Homozygous mutant genotypes were found in the control group (two 11/11), azoospermia group (two: one 9/11 and one 11/11), normozoospermia group (one 11/11) and the known cause group (one 11/11) (Table 2 and Figure 2). No homozygous mutant genotypes were found in the severe and mild oligozoospermia groups. The relatively higher frequency of the homozygous mutant genotypes in these three groups (2.8, 2.6 and 3.5%) in comparison with the control group (1.6%) was not statis tically different.
Table 1. Allele frequency of the POLG CAG repeats in different groups of infertile/subfertile males and fertile controls

Table 2. Genotype frequency of the POLG CAG repeats in different groups of infertile/subfertile males and fertile controls

|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|