
CAG REPEAT POLYMORPHISM OF THE MITOCHONDRIAL
DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA GENE IN MACEDONIAN
INFERTILE AND FERTILE MEN Plaseski T1,2, Noveski P1, Dimitrovski C2, Efremov GD1,
Plaseska-Karanfilska D1 *Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Dr. Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts,
Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Av. Krste Misirkov 2, POB 428, 1000
Skopje, R. Macedonia; Tel.: +389-2-3235-410; Fax: +389-2-3115-434; E-mail: dijana@manu.edu.mk page: 37
|
INTRODUCTION
Infertility/subfertility affects approximately 5-7% of the male population worldwide and may increase in the future [1]. Infertility/subfertility of undefined cause is referred to as idiopathic infertility/ subfertility, but is likely to be of genetic origin. Although the number of candidate spermatogenesis genes is steadily increasing, their patho genic role is largely unknown. A recent report focused on gene polymorphisms as a cause for impairment of sperm production and male infertility [2]. The mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma (POLG) gene is located on chromosome 15q24 and contains a poly morphic CAG repeat [3]. The common allele contains 10 CAG repeats and occurs at a uniformly high frequency (88-96%) in Eurasian populations [4-6]. The not10 CAG repeat alleles (ranging from six to 15) are considered as mutants. Rovio et al. [3] reported a strong association between the absence of the 10 CAG allele and male infer tility, specifically with moderate oligozoospermia, and hypothesized that the presence of two mutant alleles would lead to a suboptimal polymerase activity with accumula tion of mutations in mtDNA, impaired energy metabolism in the spermatogenic cells and disturbance of sperm pro duction and/or differentiation. Later Jensen et al. [7] sug gested that the POLG gene polymorphism should be con sidered as a possible contributing factor in patients with unexplained subfertility and normal semen parameters. However, studies in Italy [8,9] and France [10] did not confirm any influence of the POLG CAG polymorphism on the efficiency of spermatogenesis and male fertility. Recently, a difference has been reported in the number of CAG repeats of the POLG gene between Chinese and European males, and it was proposed that the 10/not 10 CAG genotype may affect sperm motility n Chinese males [11]. The aim of this study was to assess whether different POLG CAG alleles are associated with impaired spermato genesis and infertility/subfertility in Macedonian men.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|