CAG REPEAT NUMBER IN ANDROGEN RECEPTOR GENE
AND MALE INFERTILITY
Plaseski T1,2, Noveski P1, Dimitrovski C2, Kocevska B2, Efremov GD1, Plaseska-Karanfilska D1,*
*Corresponding Author: : Dr. Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Av. Krste Misirkov 2, POB 428, 1000 Skopje, R. Macedonia; Tel: +389 2 3235 410 Fax: +389 2 3115 434; E-mail: dijana@manu.edu.mk
page: 19
|
INTRODUCTION
Infertility occurs in 10-15% of couples, male factor infertility representing about 50% of the cases [1]. It is now evident that a significant proportion of male infertility is associated with a variety of genetic abnormalities. Genetic defects associated with male infertility include chromosomal aberrations, Y chromosome microdeletions involving one or more azoospermia factor (AZF) regions, mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, and mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) gene.
Androgens are essential for male sexual development and for fertility. They act through the AR, which is a transcriptional factor that contains functional domains for DNA binding, ligand binding and transcriptional regulation. The 5' end of exon 1 of the AR gene includes a polymorphic CAG triplet repeat that codes for a polyglutamine tract. The number of CAG repeats in the normal population varies between 10 and 36. Expansion of the polyglutamine tract to >38 repeats in males leads to Kennedy disease [spinal bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA)] [2]. In addition to neurological symptoms, SBMA patients show signs of hypogonadism, such as gynecomastia, impotence, testicular atrophy and reduced fertility.
In vitro studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between CAG repeat size and AR function [3]. Short AR CAG repeat tracts have been associated with prostate cancer [4] and polycystic ovary syndrome [5], while long CAG repeat tracts have been associated with moderate-to-severe undermasculinization [6], breast cancer [7] and male subfertility [8]. The possible association of a long CAG repeat with male infertility in Asian populations was suggested because of a four-fold increase in the risk of impaired spermatogenesis in males who had >28 CAG repeats [8]. Since then, the association of the long CAG repeat number in the AR gene and male infertility has been controversial. This study aims to evaluate the possible effect of long CAG repeat tracts in the AR on infertility among Macedonian men.
|
|
|
|
|
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|