
THE SULT1A1 ALLELE WITH LOW POTENTIAL FOR ESTROGEN INACTIVATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED COLORECTAL CANCER RISK IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN Sterjev Z1*, Josifovski T2*, Panovski M2, Suturkova L1, Dimovski AJ1 *Corresponding Author: Professor Aleksandar J. Dimovski, M.D., Ph.D., Pharmacogenetic Laboratory, Institute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel.: +389-2-3217-580; Fax: +389-2-3290-830; E-mail: adimovski@baba.ff.ukim.edu.mk
* Contributed equally to this paper and should both be considered as first authors. page: 43
|
DISCUSSION
We have presented data from a case/control study which suggest that the low-activity SULT1A1*His allele is associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk in Macedonia, primarily in females >60 years of age. This is an observation that has not been reported before. Published studies on the influence of the SULT1A1 variant on colorectal cancer risk either do not show any effect of this variant [15-19] or suggest that the SULT1A1*Arg allele is protective in patients <80 years of age [1]. It is difficult to explain these results outside the context of the overall influence of low penetrance genes as susceptibility factors of a disease that has proven dietary and lifestyle components. Although our current understanding is rather limited, it appears that gene-gene and gene-environment interactions of low penetrance alleles have a significant influence on susceptibility to colorectal cancer, and that there might be a different set of predisposition alleles peculiar to each population [4]. The findings we record here support our previous results on the different influences of TbR-I(6A) and Cyclin D1 G480A alleles between Macedonian and US/Northwestern European populations [21,22], and strengthen the notion that colorectal cancer in various geographic areas has a dissimilar molecular pathogenesis, probably reflecting different genetic backgrounds and environmental exposures [23]. Since these molecular differences could affect prevention strategies, therapeutic efficacy and transferability of clinical trial results in this part of the world, a large prospective multicenter study is warranted to evaluate this issue.
The finding that the low-activity SULT1A1*His allele is under represented primarily in women >60 years of age is very intriguing, and tempts speculation that the primary mechanism for this is the low potential of this variant for estrogen inactivation. Numerous studies have demonstrated the influence of female hormones on suppression of colorectal carcinogenesis, as manifested by a lower incidence of colorectal cancer in women during their reproductive period [2,24]. In postmenopausal women, estrogen production is rather low and “below the protective threshold” so the sex-difference in incidence of the disease disappears in women who are not using hormone replacement therapy [25,26]. We speculate that our female patients, who are homozygotes for the low-activity SULT1A1*His allele, have a slightly higher level of estrogen that is sufficient to suppress the formation of colorectal cancer. This is a testable hypothesis, that could contribute to the elucidation of the mechanisms of the action of estrogen on the colorectal carcinogenesis and to the definition of a low-dose hormone therapy for the prevention of colorectal cancer.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|