THE SULT1A1 ALLELE WITH LOW POTENTIAL FOR ESTROGEN INACTIVATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED COLORECTAL CANCER RISK IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
Sterjev Z1*, Josifovski T2*, Panovski M2, Suturkova L1, Dimovski AJ1
*Corresponding Author: Professor Aleksandar J. Dimovski, M.D., Ph.D., Pharmacogenetic Laboratory, Institute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel.: +389-2-3217-580; Fax: +389-2-3290-830; E-mail: adimovski@baba.ff.ukim.edu.mk * Contributed equally to this paper and should both be considered as first authors.
page: 43

DISCUSSION

We have presented data from a case/control study which suggest that the low-activity SULT1A1*His allele is associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk in Macedonia, primarily in females >60 years of age. This is an observation that has not been reported before. Published studies on the influence of the SULT1A1 variant on colo­rectal cancer risk either do not show any effect of this variant [15-19] or suggest that the SULT1A1*Arg allele is protective in patients <80 years of age [1]. It is difficult to explain these results outside the context of the overall influence of low penetrance genes as susceptibility factors of a disease that has proven dietary and lifestyle components. Although our current understanding is rather limited, it appears that gene-gene and gene-environment interactions of low penetrance alleles have a significant influence on susceptibility to colorectal cancer, and that there might be a different set of predisposition alleles peculiar to each population [4]. The findings we record here support our previous results on the different influences of TbR-I(6A) and Cyclin D1 G480A alleles between Macedonian and US/Northwestern European populations [21,22], and strengthen the notion that colorectal cancer in various geographic areas has a dissimilar molecular pathogenesis, probably reflecting different genetic backgrounds and environmental exposures [23]. Since these molecular differences could affect prevention strategies, therapeutic efficacy and transferability of clinical trial results in this part of the world, a large prospective multicenter study is warranted to evaluate this issue.
The finding that the low-activity SULT1A1*His allele is under represented primarily in women >60 years of age is very intriguing, and tempts speculation that the primary mechanism for this is the low potential of this variant for estrogen inactivation. Numerous studies have demon­strated the influence of female hormones on suppression of colorectal carcinogenesis, as manifested by a lower incidence of colorectal cancer in women during their reproductive period [2,24]. In postmenopausal women, estrogen production is rather low and “below the protective threshold” so the sex-difference in incidence of the disease disappears in women who are not using hormone replacement therapy [25,26]. We speculate that our female patients, who are homozygotes for the low-activity SULT1A1*His allele, have a slightly higher level of estrogen that is sufficient to suppress the formation of colorectal cancer. This is a testable hypothesis, that could contribute to the elucidation of the mechanisms of the action of estrogen on the colorectal carcinogenesis and to the definition of a low-dose hormone therapy for the prevention of colorectal cancer.




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006