
THE APOPLIPOPROTEIN E (APOE) GENOTYPE IN
A TURKISH POPULATION WITH ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
M.B. Yoke_1, M. Emre2, H. Harmanc_3, H. Gürvit2,
H. Hana_as_2, H. _ahin2, B. Bilgiē2, A.N. Ba_ak1
*Corresponding Author: A. Nazl_ Ba_ak, PhD, Bo_aziēi University, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Bebek 34342, Istanbul, Turkey; Tel.: +90-212-359-66-79; Fax: +90-212-287-24-68; E-mail: basak@ boun.edu.tr page: 57
|
DISCUSSION
In well-developed countries with longer life expectancy, AD is a major health problem. In 2000, 4.5 million people in the United States were estimated to have AD, the third leading cause of death, after heart disease and cancer [29]. It has been suggested that 22 million people worldwide will develop AD by 2025 [30]. Because of its vast effects on the quality of life for the affected and the caregivers, AD brings heavy demands on health care systems. In the United States, the estimated annual cost of caring for a single AD patient is US$47,000, resulting in a total health care bill of more than US$67.3 billion per year [31-33].
The E4 allele of the ApoE gene is the most common genetic determinant of susceptibility to sporadic AD, which constitutes >98% of all AD cases. The major neuropathological phenotype of the E4 genotype is increased amyloid β (Aβ) deposition. ApoE isoforms may affect amyloid levels in the brains of AD patients by being involved in the clearance or in the deposition of Aβ. The first would include association of ApoE with Aβ and interaction between ApoE-Aβ complexes and ApoE receptors [34]. The second is supported by several studies which have suggested that E4 causes greater aggregation of Aβ than does E3 [35]. Significant differences in allelic variations of the ApoE gene have been observed between Caucasian, Chinese, Japanese and Black races [36,37]. The E3 allele is the most common allele in all populations studied, while the E4 allele is not a uniform risk factor for AD in all ethnic groups, including African-Americans and Hispanics [38,39]. The ApoE allele and genotype distributions in 1,017 elderly Turkish individuals are in accordance with those from two previous studies in the Turkish population [24,25]. The frequencies of E2 and E4 alleles are among the lowest reported worldwide and different from those of other Caucasian populations. The low E4 allele agrees with the north-south gradient for the frequency of this allele in Europe (from 24% in Finland to 6.5% in Greece) [40]. The E4 allele is almost twice as frequent in patients with AD, as in non AD controls. Multivariate analyses and OR determinations reveal that carrying at least one E4 allele constitutes a significant risk factor for sporadic AD in the Turkish population. The E2 allele did not lower the risk significantly, although the OR was lower than 1, possibly because of the relatively small population size and low frequency of E2 in this population. Higher education lowered the risk for AD, but there was no interaction between education level and ApoE status, suggesting that education and ApoE status modify the risk for AD in an independent manner. In conclusion, the E4 allele of the ApoE gene constitutes a significant risk factor for AD in the Turkish population. The low frequency of the E4 allele may theoretically decrease the probability of developing AD in the Turkish population; this assumption needs to be verified in prevalence studies.
Table 4. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of various putative risk factors for AD in the population studied [E2/E4 heterozygotes (n = 1) were excluded].
|
AD |
Non AD Controla |
p |
OR |
95% CI |
Lower |
Upper |
Genotype
- E3/E3
- At least one E4 allele
- At least one E2 allele
|
43 20
5
|
91 20
15
|
2.21
0.72
|
1.0 2.21
0.72
|
– 1.04
0.24
|
– 4.71
2.21
|
Gender
- Male
- Female
|
19 49 |
48 78 |
0.69 |
1.0 1.15 |
– 0.57 |
– 2.33 |
Age Group
- 70-79
- 80-90
- 90+
|
46 18 4 |
89 35 2 |
0.95 0.19 |
1.0 1.02 3.26 |
– 0.50 0.56 |
– 2.07 18.97 |
Education Level
- No schooling
- Primary
- Secondary
- College
|
22 24 29 3 |
19 31 39 27 |
0.77 0.35 0.01 |
1.0 1.13 0.68 0.17 |
– 0.51 0.30 0.04 |
– 2.50 1.53 0.66 |
a Non AD, cognitively normal individuals.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|