
THE APOPLIPOPROTEIN E (APOE) GENOTYPE IN
A TURKISH POPULATION WITH ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
M.B. Yoke_1, M. Emre2, H. Harmanc_3, H. Gürvit2,
H. Hana_as_2, H. _ahin2, B. Bilgiē2, A.N. Ba_ak1
*Corresponding Author: A. Nazl_ Ba_ak, PhD, Bo_aziēi University, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Bebek 34342, Istanbul, Turkey; Tel.: +90-212-359-66-79; Fax: +90-212-287-24-68; E-mail: basak@ boun.edu.tr page: 57
|
INTRODUCTION
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), first described by the German physician Alois Alzheimer in 1907 in the neuropathological study of a 51-year-old woman, is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly. It is characterized by gradual and progressive decline in intellectual functions, such as deficits of recent memory and language, associated with visuospatial and attention problems. Psychosis, depression, agitation and anxiety are also common symptoms [1]. Following an extended period of loss of personality and cognition, the symptoms become increasingly distressing for the patient(s) and those who care for them, and result in a state of complete dependency.
The majority of AD cases are sporadic, but it is clear that the disease has a genetic etiology. The inheritance pattern in most families with more than one AD case is unclear. In a small number of pedigrees, AD segregates in a manner consistent with a fully penetrant autosomal dominant trait resulting from a single gene defect. When mutated, three genes are known that cause early-onset AD (EOAD): -amyloid precursor protein gene (APP), presenilin-1 gene (PS1) and presenilin-2 gene (PS2). Together, they account for 30-50% of the families with autosomal dominant EOAD, which represents 2-10% of the whole AD population. No mutations in these genes have been identified in late-onset AD (LOAD) patients (i.e., after 65 years of age) [2].
In contrast to EOAD, the inheritance pattern in most LOAD families is less clear, and suggests that a complex interaction of genetic and environmental factors underlies the etiology. A wide range of onset ages makes it difficult to distinguish between those who are at risk for the disease and of those who have escaped it. The presence of the 4 allele of the Apoplipoprotein E (ApoE) gene is the most common genetic determinant of susceptibility to AD. However, by itself the E4 allele is not sufficient to cause AD, thus not everyone who has the E4 allele will develop AD, while many who lack the allele will develop AD [3].
The human ApoE gene (OMIM #107741) is located in a cluster with ApoC-I, ApoC-I' and ApoC-II on the long arm of chromosome 19. It contains four exons and spans 3.7 kb [4]. Thus, the transcription start site lies in the second exon and the first exon is not translated. Some 30 ApoE variants have been characterized, of which 14 are associated with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia [5]. The most common variants are ApoE2, ApoE3 and ApoE4, with frequencies of 0.11, 0.72 and 0.17, respectively [6]. The E4 isoform is associated with increased levels of total cholesterol and betalipoprotein [7] that result in an increased susceptibility to heart disease [8]. Because of its reduced binding affinity to cellular receptors, the E2 isoform is associated with decreased levels of cholesterol and betalipoprotein [7]. Most of type II hyperlipidemia patients are homozygous for E2 [9].
The ApoE protein (ApoE) is a major serum lipoprotein of 34.2 kDa, that is secreted by many organs, such as macrophages, adrenal glands, and mainly by the liver [10]. It is incorporated into lipoproteins and directs their catabolism via binding receptors [11]. Although ApoE cannot cross the blood-brain barrier, it is present in the cerebrospinal fluid as a component of lipoproteins and lipid complexes and is the main apolipoprotein in the brain, synthesized by astrocytes [12]. It is thought to be involved in the metabolism and redistribution of cholesterol and phospholipid during membrane modelling, by its ability to bind and transport cholesterol-rich lipids into cells via interaction with ApoE receptors. The increased synthesis of ApoE after neuronal injury, in peripheral and central nervous systems, indicates its involvement in neuronal regeneration [13]. There is also an isoform-specific effect of ApoE on the growth and sprouting of cultured dorsal root ganglia neurons and on a murine neuroblastoma cell line [14].
The E4 allele is associated with sporadic and familial AD of early- or late-onset [15], Lewy body dementia [16], severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy [17], and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease [18]. It may influence the preclinical progression, and therefore the age of onset. Increased frequency of the E4 allele was first observed in late-onset familial AD, but further studies demonstrated that it was also overrepresented in sporadic LOAD cases and in young-onset cases in which there was approximately 3-fold higher frequency [19-21]. The decrease in frequency of E2 allele in AD suggests that it has a negative or protective effect on AD [22]. These results have been confirmed in several populations [23].
The distribution of the ApoE allele frequency in two groups of the adult Turkish population (mean ages 40.8 and 44.3 years, respectively) has been reported previously [24,25]. The objective of the present study is to determine the frequency of the common ApoE alleles, E2, E3 and E4, in a Turkish population with AD, and in non-AD elderly controls, in order to determine the risk constituted by ApoE allele status for AD.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|