ROLE OF CHROMOSOMES IN EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT
Geraedts JPM*
*Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Joep P.M. Geraedts, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Maastricht, P.O. Box 1475, 6201 BL Maastricht, The Netherlands; Tel.: +31-43-3875840; Fax: +31-43-3877877; E-mail: joep.geraedts@gen.unimaas.nl
page: 3

CHROMOSOME ABNORMALITIES IN CLINICAL MISCARRIAGES AND IN LIVE¬BORN CHILDREN

Chromosomal studies of spontaneous abortion speci­mens are difficult to carry out because: 1) frequently the material is not suitable for cytogenetic preparation, 2) occasionally the abortion product has been fixed in preser­vative for histological examination, making culture and karyotyping impossible, 3) some specimens that are prop­erly sent to the cytogenetic laboratory appear to be con­taminated after the culture has been started, 4) a few spec­imens do not show any growth because intrauterine death occurred long before the tissue was expelled and removed, 5) the yield from some cultures suffers because of a lack or complete absence of embryonic tissues or membranes, and 6) the culture and karyotype analysis is expensive. Therefore, cytogenetic studies of abortion material are only successful in a minority of cases.

The first chromosomal analysis of spontaneous miscar­riage revealed triploid cells in two abortions [53]. Then two XO abortuses were reported [54]. Since then, numer­ous studies have made it clear that the majority of first- trimester abortions are caused by chromosome anomalies.

The most common abnormality is trisomy, which arises de novo as a result of meiotic non disjunction dur­ing gametogenesis in parents with a normal karyotype. The incidence increases with maternal age. Trisomy 16 ac­counts for 30% of all trisomies. Trisomy for all chromo­somes, except chromosome 1, has been observed in sponta­neous abortion. Occasionally, double trisomies and tetra­somies are observed. Autosomal monosomies are practi­cally unknown in human miscarriages, but monosomy X is a frequent finding. The abnormality most frequently result­ing from abnormal fertilization is triploidy.


Finally, there is a group showing structural chromo­some abnormalities, mainly translocations and inversions. About half the number in this group results from karyo­typic abnormalities in the father or, more frequently, the mother. This is the most important chromosomal reason for recurrent miscarriage [55].

Systematic studies on the chromosomal status of spon­taneous abortions [1,56,57] were improved by the chorion villus biopsy technique. This was introduced on a large scale for prenatal diagnosis and also allows direct analysis of well-preserved villus material, evacuated from the uter­ine cavity in those cases of retained abortion identified by ultrasound examination before any clinical evidence of pregnancy interruption had been obtained [2,58,59]. It has recently become possible to study spontaneous abortions using CGH, even after unsuccessful culture [13].

Only three autosomal trisomies are regularly observed at birth: trisomies 13, 18 and 21. They have an estimated prenatal survival of 3, 5 and 20% respectively. The other autosomal trisomies have an estimated survival to term of less than 1/1,000 [24]. Sex chromosome aneuploidies survive normally with the exception of 45,X which is le­thal in about 98% of cases [24]. There is no difference between the ages of mothers of live born trisomic children and those spontaneously aborted.




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006