ROLE OF CHROMOSOMES IN EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT
Geraedts JPM*
*Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Joep P.M. Geraedts, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Maastricht, P.O. Box 1475, 6201 BL Maastricht, The Netherlands; Tel.: +31-43-3875840; Fax: +31-43-3877877; E-mail: joep.geraedts@gen.unimaas.nl
page: 3

ANEUPLOIDY IN OOCYTES

Since the first report on the study of meiosis in human oocytes [18], numerous publications have described the cytogenetic analysis of inseminated oocytes that failed to fertilize in vitro. Data on 2,434 oocytes, reported by 12 groups, have shown that the incidence of chromosome anomalies ranges from 8 to 54% with an average of 27%. The latter figure can be subdivided as follows: 13% hypo­haploidy, 8% hyperhaploidy, 2% structural abnormalities and 4% diploidy [19]. In another study of 400 oocytes showing no sign of fertilization or cleavage, 124 were unanalyzable and 79 were normal haploid [20]. The re­maining oocytes were abnormal, but no instance of hyper­haploidy was noted. An increase in maternal age resulted in an increased embryonic aneuploidy rate and in an in­creased frequency of spontaneous abortion. Both increases result from non disjunction that gives rise to autosomal trisomy. For all chromosomes except the largest, the non disjunction rate increased with age [21]. On the other hand, monosomy X showed an inverse maternal age effect. The maternal age effect on aneuploidy that holds in spon­taneous abortions and liveborns has also been demon­strated in morphologically and developmentally normal pre implantation embryos [22]. Oocyte meiosis is very sensitive to endogenous or exogenous factors, that could lead to chromosomally abnormal oocytes and thus to ab­normal zygotes [23].


The difference in age-related aneuploidy between oocytes and miscarried embryos might be explained on the basis of pre implantation or early post implantation loss. For chromosomes 13, 18 and 21, aneuploidy in clinically recognized pregnancies increases from 1.3% in the 35-39 age group to 4.3% in the 40-45 age group. However, in cleavage stage embryos, it has been observed by that the aneuploidy rates for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 increased from 5 and 10% in the 20-34 and 35-39 age groups, respectively, to 28% in the 40-45 age group [22]. If only normally developing embryos are considered, the differences are even greater, increasing from 4% in the 20-34 age group to 37.2% in the 40-45 age group.

There seems to be no effect of maternal age on tri­ploidy and tetraploidy, which originate at fertilization and during pre implantation development, respectively. This confirms that maternal age is a factor that only influences meiosis. The cause of non disjunction in oocytes of older women is largely unknown. Although an increase in mater­nal age is accompanied by a reduction in chiasma fre­quency of all chromosomes, the distribution of the meiotic errors is not identical for every chromosome. For example, trisomy 16 always show a maternal meiosis-I (M-I) error. Trisomy 18, on the other hand, results predominantly from meiosis-II (M-II) errors [24].

Premature centromere division at M-I has been sug­gested as an alternative mechanism for trisomy formation [25,26]. Unfertilized oocytes obtained following ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) were studied during M-II for M-I errors. None of the chromosome com­plements studied had an extra whole chromosome. This finding was not in line with the theory of non disjunction which proposes that both chromosomes of the bivalent fail to disjoin at M-I so that both move to one pole, and result in an additional whole chromosome at M-II metaphase. The only abnormality found in the M-II oocytes was that single chromatids (half chromosomes) replaced whole chromosomes. Analysis of the chromosomally abnormal oocytes revealed a close correlation with results on tri­somies in spontaneous abortions, with respect to chromo­some distribution, frequency, and maternal age, and indi­cated the likelihood of the chromatid abnormalities being the M-I non disjunction products that led to trisomy for­mation after fertilization. In light of the data which show that altered recombination patterns of the affected chro­mosomes are a key feature of most M-I origin trisomies, the oocyte data obtained by Angell [25,26] imply that the vulnerable meiotic configurations arising from altered recombination patterns are processed as functional uni­valents in older women.


The association between non disjunction and maternal age in M-II oocytes using FISH has been analyzed in a study of oocytes and their corresponding polar bodies [27]. The chromosomes of both division products complemented each other and provided an internal control to differentiate between aneuploidy and technical errors. Two mechanisms of non disjunction were determined. First, non disjunction of bivalent chromosomes going to the same pole and, sec­ond, non disjunction by premature chromatid chromatid separation (predivision) of univalent chromosomes produc­ing either a balanced (2 + 2) or unbalanced (3 + 1) distri­bution of chromatids into the first polar body and M-II oocytes. Balanced predivision of oocytes, proposed by Angell [20] as a major mechanism of aneuploidy, in­creases significantly with time in culture, which suggests that this phenomenon should be carefully interpreted. Unbalanced predivision and classical non disjunction were unaffected by aging of the oocyte. In comparing oocytes from women younger than 35 years of age with oocytes from women above the age of 40 years, a significant in­crease in non disjunction of full dyads was found in the oocytes with analyzable polar bodies and no errors on FISH. Premature predivision of chromatids was also found to cause non disjunction, but it did not increase with ma­ternal age.

The effect of maternal age on the incidence of chro­mosomal abnormalities was investigated on more than 3,000 unfertilized human oocytes [28]. Various types of numerical abnormalities were observed but no significant difference was found in the mean age of women according to the chromosome abnormalities, and there was a positive relationship between maternal age and the global rate of aneuploidy, in agreement with the findings of epidemio­logical studies [28].




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006