
MOLECULAR MONITORING OF CHIMERISM AFTER BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN BULGARIA Velizarova M1, Zaharieva B2, Dimova I2, Nikolova D2, Atanasova S2,
Avramova B3, Mihailov G3, Jordanova M3, Bobev D3, Toncheva D2,* *Corresponding Author: Professor Draga Toncheva, Department of Medical Genetics, Medical Faculty of Sofia, 2 Zdrave str., 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria; Tel./Fax: +359-2-9520357; E-mail: dragatoncheva@yahoo.com page: 37
|
INTRODUCTION
Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the most effective therapy for many patients with leukemia. Three possible situations of chimerism can be encountered during assessment of the hematological status in patients after allogeneic BMT: 1) complete chimerism (CC), where the marrow and circulating blood cells are all of donor origin; 2) near-complete chimerism (NCC), where over 90% of the cell components are of donor origin; 3) mixed chimerism (MC), where the cell components are of both donor and recipient origins. In CC or NCC, durable engraftment is achieved.
Evaluation of the chimerism status after BMT provides substantial information about the replacement of host cells with donor cells. Since hematopoietic chimerism is predictive of the early relapse of acute leukemia [1-3], development of effective molecular-diagnostic methods for monitoring of chimerism is an important tool for determining the risk of relapse in patients after BMT [4-6].
Methods for detection of chimerism include conversion of blood group, karyotyping, analysis of variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) and microsatellite assay [7-11]. The most sensitive and accurate methods are fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with specific probes for the sex chromosomes (XY-FISH) and multiplex short tandem repeat polymerase chain reaction (STR-PCR) with capillary electrophoresis for quantification of chimerism [12-14]. The latter approach is sex-independent and can be applied to virtually all patients. In this article we describe our experience in the detection of chimerism after BMT in Bulgaria.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|