DETECTION OF TRISOMY 21 BY QUANTITATIVE FLUORESCENCE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION
Madalina Badila1*, Augustin Ofiteru1, Lorand Savu1, Dinu Florin Albu1, Dragos T. Stefanescu2
*Corresponding Author: Badila Madalina Genetic Lab SRL, Str. Garleni 3, Bl. C79, sector 6, 051651 Bucharest, Romania Tel: +0421 4131423 ; Fax: +0421 4028091 E-mail: office@geneticlab.ro
page: 23

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 15 blood samples were investigated in this study by both conventional cytogenetic tehnique and QF-PCR method. Analysis of fluorescent amplified DNA samples is made qualitatively by determination of allelic signal number and quantitatively by measurement of allelic fluorescent intensity. Normal heterozygous samples display diallelic peaks corresponding to two different alleles with peak fluorescence intensity ratio of approximately 1:1, whereas normal homozygous samples display only one peak corresponding of two identical alleles (Fig. 1). Trisomic samples display either 3 peaks of similar intensity or 2 peaks but with fluorescence intensity ratio of approx. 2:1 [3].

All 5 normal individuals examined in our study was heterozygous and showed two allelic peaks for both D21S11 and Penta D STR markers with peak height ratio of 1:1. Four of ten 21 trisomic samples showed a triallelic pattern with peak height ratio of approximately 1:1:1 for both D21S11 and Penta D markers. Four trisomic samples showed a diallelic pattern with peak height ratio of 1.6 - 2.3 for D21S11 marker and 1.7 – 1.9 for  Penta D marker. One trisomic sample displayed a triallelic pattern for D21S11 marker and a diallelic pattern with peak height ratio of 2.3 for Penta D marker whereas another trisomic sample showed a triallelic pattern for Penta D marker and a diallelic pattern with peak height ratio of 1.7 for D21S11 marker.  Figure 2 (A) illustrates a trisomy 21 case with a triallelic pattern for both D21S11 and Penta D markers. Figure 2 (B) shows a trisomy 21 case with a diallelic pattern (2:1 dosage ratio) for both 21 chromosome markers.

The results obtained using quantitative fluorescent PCR were in concordance with the conventional cytogenetic results. 

This study represent our first attempt to evaluate a molecular method for detection of trisomy 21. The preliminary data obtained successfully confirm the cytogenetic diagnosis of trisomy 21 and demonstrated that this tehnique is suitable for the rapid postnatal detection of Down syndrome.

Fig.1. Electroforetograms of amplification of a) a normal homozygous disomic sample; b) a normal heterozygous disomic sample; c) a triallelic trisomic sample; d) a diallelic trisomic sample (2:1 dosage ratio)

 

 

 

Fig.2. Electrophoretograms of fluorescent D21S11 and Penta D amplified STR markers. (A) a trisomy 21 affected patient with a triallelic pattern with peak height ratio of 1:1:1; (B) a trisomy 21 affected patient with a diallelic pattern with peak height ratio of 2:1




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006