
DETECTION OF TRISOMY 21 BY QUANTITATIVE FLUORESCENCE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION Madalina Badila1*, Augustin Ofiteru1, Lorand Savu1, Dinu Florin Albu1,
Dragos T. Stefanescu2
*Corresponding Author: Badila Madalina
Genetic Lab SRL, Str. Garleni 3, Bl. C79, sector 6, 051651 Bucharest, Romania
Tel: +0421 4131423 ; Fax: +0421 4028091
E-mail: office@geneticlab.ro
page: 23
|
INTRODUCTION
Trisomies are genetic disorders due to additional chromosome in the normal chromosome complement and are associated with distinctive phenotypic traits, different organ systems malformation and mental retardation. Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) is the most frequent numerical chromosome disorder with an incidence of 1 in 700 newborns and is due to an extra 21 chromosome , an unbalanced translocations involving chromosome 21 or a duplication of a region of the chromosome[1-2].
Diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities is usually performed by cytogenetic analysis but this tehnique requires a high number of cells for cultures, great tehnical expertise and to much time for performing (2-3 weeks) [3].
In 1993 Mansfield described for the first time an alternative molecular method for diagnosis of trisomies - the quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction tehnique (QF-PCR) which is based on the amplification of highly polymorphic STR (short tandem repeats or microsatellites) markers specific for the chromosome involved in trisomy using fluorescent labeled oligonucleotides, followed by quantitative detection of amplified DNA signal by capillary elecrophoresis [4]. This tehnique has succesfully been applied for the detection of trisomies and described in a series of reports [3,5-7].
In this study we examined the amplification of D21S11 and Penta D STR loci on the chromosome 21 from ten 21 clinical diagnosed trisomic patients and five normal individuals using fluorescent PCR aiming to verify the medical diagnostic value of this tehnique. The patients were initially diagnosed by convetional cytogenetic tehnique. The samples were obtained after informed consent of the patients.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|