
PHENOTYPIC VARIABILITY OF COWDEN SYNDROME WITHIN A SINGLE FAMILY: IMPACT ON DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND GENETIC COUNSELLING Ilic N1, Mitrovic N2, Radeta R3, Krasić S4,5, Vukomanović V4,5, Samardzija G2, Vasic M6, Vlahovic A5,6, Sarajlija A1,5 *Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Ass. Prof. Dr. Adrijan Sarajlija MD, PhD, Clinical Genetics Outpatient Clinic, Mother and Child Health Care Institute “Dr Vukan Čupić”, Radoja Dakića 6-8, 11070 Novi Beograd, Serbia; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia; e-mail: adrijans2004@yahoo.com page: 95
|
DISCUSSION
Clinical Manifestations
The clinical manifestations of CS are diverse, in-
volving hamartomas in the skin, thyroid, gastrointestinal
tract, and other tissues (1). Macrocephaly, often present
at birth or early infancy, is a key diagnostic feature in
children, accompanied by facial dysmorphism such as
a high anterior hairline and hypertelorism (6). Develop-
mental delays and ASD, seen in up to 25% of patients,
are frequent neurological findings, with brain imaging
sometimes revealing structural anomalies, often white
matter lesions (6, 7). The clinical manifestations of
CS are diverse, involving hamartomas in the skin, thy-
roid, gastrointestinal tract, and other tissue (8–10).
Recognizable dermatological traits include trichilem-
momas around the nose and mouth, oral papillomas, and
acral keratoses (9, 10). Sclerotic fibromas and lipomas,
presenting as soft, mobile masses on the torso or ex-
tremities, further define the dermatological profile (8, 9).
Gastrointestinal polyps affect up to 80% of patients,
causing symptoms like abdominal pain or rectal bleed-
ing. Though mostly benign, routine colonoscopic sur-
veillance is recommended due to a small malignancy
risk (11, 12). Less common vascular anomalies, such
as arteriovenous malformations, can cause functional
issues depending on their size and location (3, 13).
In the case of our female patients, there were no elements
of macrocephaly or dyscrania, and psychomotor devel-
opment was normal. The characteristic skin changes as-
sociated with the syndrome were also absent. The only
findings that contributed to the diagnosis were the presence
of characteristic tissue tumor changes. Screening of other
organs and organ systems revealed no signs of visceral
involvement typically seen in CS. At this point, it is chal-
lenging to speculate on the genotype-phenotype correla-
tion, given that this particular genotype, to our knowledge,
has not been phenotypically described in any previously
published case report in the available literature.
Genotype-Phenotype Correlation
and Penetrance in CS
The PTEN variant identified in this family,
c.48T>A (p.Tyr16Ter), represents a nonsense mutation
associated with a truncated, non-functional protein.
We confirmed by the thorough review of the available
literature that the PTEN variant c.48T>A (p.Tyr16Ter) is
a previously recognized pathogenic mutation. However,
a detailed search of medical articles available online has
not identified any publications to date presenting the clini-
cal features of patients harboring this specific genotype.
Genotype-phenotype correlations in CS demonstrate sig-
nificant variability in clinical presentations, with features
ranging from benign hamartomas to malignant transforma-
tions (14, 15). For example, catalytic domain mutations
are strongly associated with severe neurodevelopmental
outcomes, including ASD and intellectual disability (6,
14). Beyond genotypic effects, traits such as macrocephaly,
vascular anomalies, and lipomatous changes suggest po-
tential phenotypic synergy, where certain characteristics
amplify others (15). This interplay may result from shared
developmental pathways disrupted by PTEN dysfunc-
tion. Macrocephaly, for instance, often correlates with
altered brain architecture, predisposing to neurodevelop-
mental disorders (7). Similarly, vascular anomalies like
angiomatosis or arteriovenous malformations may exac-
erbate tissue overgrowth, contributing to complex lesions
like PTEN hamartoma of soft tissue (PHOST) (8, 13).
Incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity are im-
portant characteristics of PTEN-related disorders, with up
to 15% of carriers remaining asymptomatic throughout life
(16). Modifier genes, environmental influences, and epi-
genetic factors likely contribute to this variability, as sug-
gested by studies in other hamartomatous syndromes such
as Peutz-Jeghers and juvenile polyposis syndrome(15)
Malignant Alterations in CS
and Age-Related Observations
CS is associated with an elevated lifetime risk of
malignancies, particularly breast, thyroid, and endometrial
cancers, with risk estimates reaching 85% for breast cancer
in females and 35% for thyroid cancer (6, 17). However,
in this family, two older members (the paternal grandfa-
ther and the great-aunt) have not developed malignancies
despite their advanced age. This observation could be ex-
plained by the incomplete penetrance and suggests possible
protective factors that warrant further investigation.
Age at onset of malignancies in CS varies, with breast
cancer often developing by the fourth decade and thyroid
malignancies potentially occurring earlier (14, 17). Other
common malignancies include thyroid (especially follicu-
lar carcinoma) and endometrial cancers, warranting regular
thyroid ultrasounds and gynecological evaluation (5, 18).
Risks of renal cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer further
emphasize the need for comprehensive cancer surveillance
protocols (19). Interestingly, hepatic tumors have been
reported in older individuals with CS, particularly in the
context of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (20). The
absence of malignancies in older family members suggests
the need for personalized surveillance plans tailored to
individual risk factors. Regular screening, including breast
MRI and thyroid ultrasound, is therefore essential, even
in asymptomatic carriers (5, 17).
Therapeutic and Surveillance Considerations
While surgical management of benign tumors pro-
vides effective short-term relief, recurrence is common, as
seen in this case. The use of pharmacological approaches,
including mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus and everoli-
mus, offers a promising strategy for reducing tumor burden
by targeting dysregulated cell growth pathways in PTEN-
mutant cells. Hormonal therapies, such as tamoxifen, may
also be considered for risk reduction in individuals predis-
posed to breast and endometrial cancers, though their use in
pediatric populations remains under investigation (21–24).
In cases where malignancies arise, targeted therapies,
such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, may complement stan-
dard oncological treatment, particularly when molecular
pathways contributing to tumor growth are identified (25).
Genetic Counseling
and Family Segregation Analysis
The autosomal dominant inheritance of CS puts im-
perative on genetic counselling for affected families. In this
case, segregation analysis confirmed the familial PTEN
mutation in the proband’s sister and father. Early identifi-
cation of mutation carriers enables the implementation of
individualized surveillance programs, which are critical for
minimizing cancer risk and improving outcomes. For at-
risk family members, genetic analysis is indicated. In case
of positive findings, regular monitoring and imaging are
essential components of the clinical approach (1, 17, 26).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|