
IN VITRO ANALYSIS OF AKR1D1 INTERACTIONS WITH CLOPIDOGREL: EFFECTS ON ENZYME ACTIVITY AND GENE EXPRESSION Shutevska K1*, Kadifkova Panovska T1, Zhivikj Z1, Kapedanovska Nestorovska A2 *Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Kristina Shutevska, Majka Tereza 47, 1000 Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia, +389 2 1326032 (142), k.sutevska@ff.ukim.edu.mk page: 69
|
INTRODUCTION
Clopidogrel, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, is a cor-
nerstone of dual antiplatelet therapy alongside aspirin,
widely used to prevent major cardiovascular events in
patients with acute coronary syndromes or undergoing
percutaneous coronary interventions (1, 2). While clopi-
dogrel has been shown to be more effective than aspirin
in reducing the risks of myocardial infarction, ischemic
stroke, and vascular death, there remains significant vari-
ability in treatment outcomes among patients (3, 4). This
variability can range from reduced efficacy or resistance
to therapy, affecting 5–44% of patients, to increased risk
of bleeding due to excessive antiplatelet activity (5, 6).
The phenomenon of “clopidogrel resistance” presents a
major clinical challenge, particularly because the underly-
ing mechanisms are not fully understood (7–9).
The metabolism of clopidogrel is complex. As a prod-
rug, it undergoes two primary processes: hydrolysis by
carboxylesterase 1 (CES1), which inactivates the majority
of the drug, and a two-step activation mediated by several
cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, which convert clopi-
dogrel to its active form (10, 11). Among these, CYP2C19
is the most crucial, with polymorphisms in this enzyme
(CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17) being major determinants of
clopidogrel’s variable pharmacokinetics and treatment out-
comes (12–14). However, these genetic variations explain
only about 12% of the observed variability, leaving much
of the interindividual differences unexplained (12, 15).
The variability in CYP enzyme activity and its ef-
fects on drug metabolism extend beyond clopidogrel,
as CYP enzymes play a pivotal role in the biotransfor-
mation of many medications (16). Aldo-Keto Reductase
1D1 (AKR1D1), an enzyme critical in bile acid synthe-
sis and steroid clearance (17–19), has been identified by
Chaudhry et al. (2013) as a key trans-regulator of the
CYP enzyme network, suggesting a broader regulatory
mechanism. AKR1D1 regulates CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and
CYP2C9 expression via its metabolic products. Specifical-
ly, the 5β-reduced steroids generated by AKR1D1 activity
act as ligands for nuclear receptors such as farnesoid X
receptor (FXR), pregnane X receptor (PXR), and consti-
tutive androstane receptor (CAR), which in turn regulate
CYP enzyme expression (20, 21). The AKR1D1*36 poly-
morphism (rs1872930), in particular, leads to increased
expression of AKR1D1, resulting in the upregulation of
these CYP enzymes (21).
Kapedanovska et al. (2019) explored this hypothesis
in the context of clopidogrel and demonstrated that the
AKR1D1*36 allele is associated with an increased risk of
major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
(MACCE) in patients treated with clopidogrel, establishing
AKR1D1 as an independent risk factor (22).
Building on previous findings linking AKR1D1*36 to
the regulation of the cytochrome P450 enzyme network,
this study seeks to elucidate the potential role of AKR1D1
in clopidogrel metabolism. Specifically, the research aims
to evaluate whether clopidogrel and its inactive metabo-
lite, 2-oxoclopidogrel, act as substrates or inhibitors of
the AKR1D1 enzyme, thereby elucidating potential in-
teractions at the protein level. Furthermore, the study in-
vestigates the influence of clopidogrel and its metabolite
on AKR1D1 gene expression in HepG2 cells to explore
potential mechanisms that could modulate clopidogrel
metabolism. These investigations are intended to provide
a deeper understanding of AKR1D1’s involvement in drug
metabolism and its broader implications for pharmacologi-
cal research.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|