
A PILOT STUDY OF ANXA2, MED12, CALM1 AND MAPK1 GENE VARIANTS IN PRIMARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM Chorti A#1, Achilla C#2, Siasiaridis A2, Aristeidis I1, Cheva A3, Theodosios Papavramidis T##1, Chatzikyriakidou A##*2,4 *Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Anthoula Chatzikyriakidou, Laboratory of Medical Biology - Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece. Tel: +30 2310999013, Email: chatzikyra@auth.gr page: 33
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty unrelated patients with primary hyperparathy-
roidism (PHPT) (2 males and 48 females, 56.1 ± 13.9
years) and an equal number of ethnically matched healthy
volunteers (8 males and 42 females, 50.6 ± 18.4 years)
were recruited for the study. The diagnosis of PHPT was
confirmed by the elevated levels of parathyroid hormone
(PTH) and calcium in blood serum, as well as through
imaging methods such as sonography, 99mTc-sestamibi
scintigraphy, and 4D-CT validated by histological exami-
nations [16]. The control group had no personal or family
history of chronic autoimmune or neoplastic diseases.
Since this study on the association of the studied vari-
ants with PHPT was conducted for the first time, it was
not possible to determine the standardized effect size to
be used before the pilot trial. Therefore, the sample size
was calculated with a 90% confidence level and a pro
babi
lity of 0.05 [17] following the suggested standards
for pilot studies [18]. The study protocol was approved
by the Ethics Committees of the Aristotle University of
Thessaloniki, and written informed consent was obtained
from each patient.
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood
lymphocytes using the PureLink Genomic DNA Kit (Inv-
itrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The sam-
ples were genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction
- restriction fragment-length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP)
assay. The primer pairs used for amplification of each
region are shown in Table 1. Amplified fragments were
then digested with appropriate restriction enzymes (New
England Biolabs - Table 1), following the manufacturer’s
instructions, and visualized after electrophoresis on 3%
agarose. All samples were run twice using RFLP analysis
confirming the credibility of the results. This methodology
is both time- and cost-saving for a pilot study like the pre-sent one. However, other genotyping methods can be uti-
lized in subsequent larger-scale studies if the results of the
present study indicate the feasibility of such an approach.
Pearson’s chi‐square test was used to examine possible de-
viations of genotype distributions from the Hardy-Weinberg
equilibrium (HWE) in the control group. Differences in
variant distribution between PHPT patients and controls
were tested under six models of genetic association: ho-
mozygote, heterozygote, dominant, recessive, allelic, and
additive using Pearson’s chi‐square test. Fisher’s exact test
was used when expected values were less than 5. Additio
nally, the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval
(CI) was calculated (reference allele vs variant allele). A
difference at p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant
in all statistical tests. All analyses were performed using
the SPSS statistical package (SPSS Inc.).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|