
THE SPECTRUM AND FREQUENCY OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS MUTATIONS IN ALBANIAN PATIENTS Kasmi I, Kasmi G, Basholli B, Sefa HS, Vevecka E *Corresponding Author: Ass. Prof. Irena Kasmi, Pediatric Clinic, Pediatric Department, University
Hospital Center “Mother Teresa”, Tirana, Albania. Address: Street Dibra 372, Tirana, Albania.
Tel: + 355 67 2066175, E-mail: irenakasmi@hotmail.com page: 31
|
DISCUSSION
This study aims to shed some light on the current
situation about CF mutation pattern, presenting data from
patients with CF followed during 2019 in the Department
of Pediatrics in the UHCMT. Practically, UHMCT is the
only center which diagnoses and follows cystic fibrosis
patients in Albania. It is important to note that in Albania
no CF national neonatal screening has been applied until
now. It is assumed that the incidence would be higher if
neonatal screening program would take place.
The Albanian population is composed of an ethnic
group originating in the Balkan peninsula. There are ap-
proximately five million Albanians in this region, with
roughly half living in Albania and the other half in Kosovo,
Northern Macedonia, Montenegro and smaller populations
in Croatia and Serbia. Significant numbers of the Albanian
population are also found in Greece and smaller insignifi-
cant communities in Bulgaria and Romania as well. Alba-
nians also make up a significant diaspora, spread all over the
world, especially in North America, Europe and Oceania.
According to the latest census of the National Institute
of Statistics Albania (INSTAT), the current population of
Albania is 2,876,591 inhabitants [7]. The most common CFTR mutation is F508del, either in
homozygous or heterozygous form. In Europe, this mutation
is met in 82% of patients with CF (41% homozygous and
41% heterozygous) [9]. Among European countries, there are
different variations of this CFTR mutation prevalence, from
Denmark 83.2% [10], to a minimal prevalence in Turkey of
only 24.5% [11]. This confirms the northwest to southeast
gradient in the F508del distribution in Europe [11]. The
Albanian population expresses a high prevalence of F508del
mutation, in comparison to other populations in the region.
Thus, in neighboring Italy is 43.9% [12], in North Macedonia
is 75.9% [13], in Serbia and Montenegro it is 72.28 % [14].
In Albania, there is a high prevalence of this mu-
tation which is characteristic of Central, Northern and
Northeastern Europe. This fact is well known and previ-
ously explained due to early migrations of the Caucasian
population towards Northwestern Europe and Southeastern
Europe, and thereafter the migration through the Mediter-
ranean routes from Middle East and Africa towards Europe
[11]. The second migration seems to have left the Albanian
population unaffected.
The second most prevalent mutation found in the Al-
banian population is 621+1G>T (2,56%). This mutation is
most prevalent in Southern Europe, found more frequently
in our neighboring country Greece (6.4%) [10], while in
North Macedonia this mutation is under 2% [15].
The third most prevalent mutations found in the Al-
banian population are G85E (2.13%) and E822X (2.13%).
The G85E mutation, is most frequent in Israel (2.6%) [10].
E822X, R1066C, G1349D, S466X, 1811+1G->C,
E831X, CFTRdele2-3(21kb) mutations were newly found
in the patients of our study. The latter, the CFTRdele2-
3(21kb) mutation, was found in only one patient in this
study, is found mainly in Slavic and Eastern and Central
European populations [16]. The most frequent result of
this mutation is in Belarus (11.2%) [10]
There are 14 CFTR mutations and 18 confirmed geno-
types. To define the optimal treatment for an individual
patient, genotyping of CFTR is clearly the first step [17].
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|