
THE SPECTRUM AND FREQUENCY OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS MUTATIONS IN ALBANIAN PATIENTS Kasmi I, Kasmi G, Basholli B, Sefa HS, Vevecka E *Corresponding Author: Ass. Prof. Irena Kasmi, Pediatric Clinic, Pediatric Department, University
Hospital Center “Mother Teresa”, Tirana, Albania. Address: Street Dibra 372, Tirana, Albania.
Tel: + 355 67 2066175, E-mail: irenakasmi@hotmail.com page: 31
|
RESULTS
Based on the number of pediatric patients diagnosed
with CF every year from 1992 to 2017, and the birth rate
during the same period [7], the incidence of CF in Albania
is 1:4041. It is important to note that this incidence is not en-
tirely correct since in the UHCMT, there are also CF patients
from Kosovo, or Albanian children born in other countries. We have presented in Table 2 an overview of the
demographic as well as the clinical and laboratory char-
acteristics of Albanian patients diagnosed at UHCMT who
were included in the study, although data on some births
are missing.
Allele Frequencies.
Among the studied group of patients, 116 of 133
patients have two CFTR alleles identified, and 6 patients
have only one mutation determined. Although genetic
examination was made possible, 11 patients remained
unexamined due to their lack of interest in performing
this analysis. As shown in Table 3, 14 CFTR mutations
were identified from 122 patients, 116 of whom with two CFTR mutations determined and 6 patients with only one
mutation determined.
The most frequent mutation is F508del with 83.19%
(203/244 alleles). F508del mutation is present in 87 homo-
zygous patients, 23 patients with heterozygous mutations,
and in all 6 patients who have only one known mutation.
The second most frequent mutation is 621+1G>T with
2.45% (6/244 alleles), followed by G85E and E822X with
2.04% (5/244 alleles), G542X (1.63%), R1066C (1.22%),
R1070Q (1.22%).
The mutations R1158X (0.81 %), S466X (0.81%),
G1349G (0.81%), N1303K (0.81%), and CFTRdele2,3(21kb) (0.40 %), E831X (0.40 %), do not surpass 1% of the CF
patients included.
According to their effect on the synthesis and/or func-
tion of the CFTR protein, 87.29 % (213/244 alleles) of the
mutations pertain to class II with four different mutations,
explained by F508del being by far the most frequent muta-
tion in this cohort.
Following class II, the second most frequent mutation
class was class I with 8.60 % (21/244 alleles) and eight dif-
ferent mutations. Three mutations are unclassified 1.22%
(3/244 alleles).Two mutations belong to class III 0.81%
(2/244 alleles). One mutation belongs to class V 0.40%
(1/244 alleles). Mutations belonging to class IV and VI
were not present in our patients. The mutation classes are
presented in Table 3. Only one mutation (1/244 alleles) has
a varying clinical expression (consequences) [8].
Genotype Frequencies
Table 4 shows the genotypes of the 116 patients for
whom the two mutations were identified, as well as their
frequency expressed in numbers and percentages.
As it is noted from the frequency of genotypes in
the Table 3, the most frequent genotype was F508del/
F508del (75%; 87/116) followed by F508del/non F508del
genotype (19.82%; 23/116) and non F508del/non F508del
(5.17%; 6/116).
From 6 patient non F508del/non F508del genotypes
resulted six different ones as follows: G542X/621+1G>T
(0.86%); G85E/R1158X (0.86%); G542X/ E822X (0.86%);
621+1G>T/621+1G>T (0.86%); CFTR dele 2.3/1811+1G-
>C (0.86%); S466X-R1070Q in cis / E822X (0.86%).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|