CO-EXISTENCE OF CYP2C19*1/*2 AND ABCB1C.3435 CT GENOTYPE HAS A POTENTIAL IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOME IN CAD PATIENTS TREATED WITH CLOPIDOGREL
Nestorovska KA, Naumovska Z, Staninova Stojovska M, Sterjev Z, Dimovski A, Suturkova Lj
*Corresponding Author: Aleksandra Kapedanovska Nestorovska, PhD, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, RN Macedonia, Mother Theresa str 47, 1000 Skopje, R. North Macedonia, Email address: alka@ff.ukim.edu.mk
page: 35

DISSCUSION

The main goal of optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary disease and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is to reduce the inci- dence of cardiovascular events. The clinical outcome of clopidogrel, as a well-established antiplatelet therapy, has high inter-individual variability within patients Although recent studies present contradictory data, our results support the association between the presence of the CYP2C19 *2, alone or in combination with the ABCB1 C and an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events compared to the carriers of the alternative alleles. The con- comitant inheritance of the genotype CYP2C19*1/*2 and ABCB1 CT have shown a significant trend toward increased risk for MACE. These finding are line with data presented in the studies conducted on a larger sample size. (16-18). According to another study ABCB1 C3435T and CYP2C19 *2 polymorphisms are recognized as signifi- cant, independent predictors for the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke. The presented results indicate that the risk for MACE is higher in patients, either as carriers of a CYP2C19 or ABCB1 reduced-function allele, or both (19). In our study it was also demonstrated that patients with normal CYP2C19 genetic status and presence of the ABCB1 CT/CC geno- type have a higher incidence of MACE, indicating that the presence of the ABCB1 C allele could be a potential negative predictor for disease outcome in patients treated with clopidogrel. In a large cohort, conducted on 2208 patients with an acute myocardial infarction receiving clopidogrel therapy, Simon et al., presented no significant association between the ABCB1 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms and the clini- cal outcome, but the presence of two CYP2C19-deficient alleles and either one or two ABCB1 variant alleles was associated with rate of events five times higher when com- pared to patients with the wild-type (20). Another study also supports the evidence that patients who are poor me- tabolizers are at greater risk of thrombotic events when treated with clopidogrel (17, 21). Several studies including the TRITON TIMI study evaluated the contribution of ABCB1 variants in patient carrying the risk allele CYP2C19*2 and confirmed that clopidogrel response depends on the complex mecha- nisms of action, including hepatic activation and also that variable response can occur due to other factors such as polymorphisms in other genes involved in clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Since this study was conducted on a small sample size, limitations should be considered when interpreting the results. This was the first conducted study in Macedonia to evaluate the concomitant influence of the ABCB13435 CT and CYP2C19*1/*2 genotypes on clinical cardiovas- cular outcomes in coronary artery disease patients on clopidogrel treatment. The evaluation was based on oc- curred major adverse cardiovascular events and plasma concentrations of clopidogrel, and its active metabolites were not monitored during the follow up. Moreover, we cannot completely exclude the probability that other risk factors, such as BMI, smoking status, lifestyle, diet etc., influence the clinical cardiovascular outcome. However, the main limitation of this study was the small number of patients included, leading to restricted statistical signifi- cance for some of the results. Additional, larger studies will be of great importance to further evaluate the relation between concomitant inheritance of the ABCB1 C3435T and CYP2C19*2 polymorphisms and clopidogrel treat- ment outcomes.



Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006