
HIGH INCIDENCE OF CONGENITAL HYPOTHYROIDISM
IN ONE REGION OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Anastasovska V, Koviloska R, Kocova M, *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Mirjana Kocova, University Clinic of Pediatrics, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje,
Republic of Macedonia. Tel.: +389(0)2-3123-224. Fax: +389(0)2-3111-713. E-mail: mirjanakocova@ yahoo.com page: 31
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Neonatal screening for CH was performed in
9757 out of 10,446 live born neonates from the nursery
at the General Hospital Borka Taleski, Prilep for
the period from June 2002 to December 2011. Heelstick
blood samples were taken by trained nurses,
mostly 48 hours after birth and transferred to Whatman
903 filter papers (LKB Vertriebs GmbH, Vienna,
Austria). They were dried and mailed daily (or every
second day) to the internationally accredited central
screening laboratory located at the University Clinic
of Pediatrics in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. Premature
or sick full-term neonates, who usually have
a prolonged stay in neonatal intensive care units, are
screened between the first and second week of age.
Neonates discharged from the nurseries before 48
hours of birth at the parent’s request, are screened at
the moment of discharge. Birth weight, gestational
age at birth, gender, and timing of sampling were
recorded by the nursery.
A time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay was applied
to measure the TSH concentration in the dry
blood spot samples using the DELFIA neonatal human
thyroid-stimulating hormone (hTSH), kit manufactured
by Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland. It is a solid
phase, two-site fluoroimmunometric assay based on
the direct sandwich technique in which two monoclonal
antibodies are directed against two separate
antigenic determinants on the hTSH molecule. The
method was performed as per the manufacturer’s
instructions. Internal and external quality assurance
controls were included in the TSH assay. Internal
controls were made simultaneously with samples to
assure the day-to-day validity of results, while external
controls from Reference Institute for Bioanalytics,
Bonn, Germany were included every 3 months.
The TSH values lower than 10 mU/L were considered
negative for specimens taken 48 hours after
birth and no further action was pursued. Results
between 10 and 20 mU/L were designated borderline
and a blood sample on a new filter paper (LKB
Vertiebs GmbH) was requested by telephone. On this
repeat sample, TSH values less than 8 mU/L were
considered normal. Thyroid-stimulating hormone
results greater than 20 mU/L on the initial sample
were considered positive for CH and the newborn
was referred for biochemical and clinical evaluation
immediately. Neonates with confirmed hypothyroidism
received therapy with levothyroxine of 10-15
μg/kg/day [1].
Statistical Analysis. Data were analyzed using
the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version
20 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and
the statistical significance was set at p <0.05. Pearson
χ2 was used for the comparison of proportions. The
Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison
of TSH mean values between different groups (according
to the day of sampling, birth weight and
gestational age at birth). The factorial-analysis of
variance (F-ANOVA) test was used for establishing
the interaction between categorical variables and the
Spearman’s coefficient for correlation.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|