
ANALYSIS OF MICROSATELLITE POLYMORPHISMS
IN SOUTH INDIAN PATIENTS WITH NON SYNDROMIC
CLEFT LIP AND PALATE Xavier DL1,* Arif YA1, Murali RV1, Kishore Kumar S1,
Vipin Kumar S2, Tamang R2, Thangaraj K2, Bhaskar LVKS3 *Corresponding Author: Dr. Dhayananth L. Xavier, Department of Orthodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College,
Pallikaranai, Chennai, India; Tel.: +91-44-22461883; E-mail: drxavy@gmail.com page: 49
|
INTRODUCTION
Cleft lip and palate are birth defects that affect
children with a variable phenotype. Approximately
70.0% of cleft lip and palate cases are non syndromic,
occurring as an isolated condition dissociated with
any recognizable anomalies [1]. Non syndromic cleft
lip, with or without cleft palate (NSCLP), is a heterogeneous,
complex disease with a high incidence in
the Asian populations. Non syndromic cleft lip and
palate is a common craniofacial malformation with a
complex genetic component. Multiple environmental
factors are known to trigger the cleft formation, although
both physiologic, pharmacologic and genetic
studies in animal models and human populations have
identified several candidate genes and pathways that
regulate transcription factors, growth factors, cell
signaling and de-toxification metabolisms [2,3]. The
genetic components of cleft that underlie the susceptibility
to respond to the environment still remain
largely unclear [4]. Previous studies revealed that
the disease-contributing alleles in many genes, but
none of these seem to play a major role in NSCLP,
and they appear to be responsible for only a fraction
of NSCLP cases [5]. Linkage studies screen the
whole genome and use parametric or non parametric
methods such as allele sharing methods with no assumptions
on the mode of inheritance, penetrance or
disease allele frequency. Although single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) are preferable markers for
association studies, the density of SNPs required is
not yet identified because of their low mutation rates. Microsatellites are the most preferred markers for
linkage analysis and population genetic studies because
of their high mutation rates. As they are highly
informative, recent genome wide association studies
used these markers to identify the genes involved in
the complex diseases.
A large number of studies of NSCLP have been
conducted mainly in Caucasian populations. However,
it is desirable to perform similar studies in different
ethnic groups of India to reiterate the status of
the association or linkage identified in other world
populations. In India, there are approximately 5,000
anthropologically well-defined populations including
different caste, tribe and religious groups. Linguistically,
the Indian populations are classified into four
major language families, such as: Indo-European,
Austro-Asiatic, Dravidian and Tibeto-Burman. Indo-
Europeans are mainly found in the northern part of
the country; Austro-Asiatic speakers have established
themselves in central and north eastern states; Tibeto-
Burmans mostly inhabit the northeastern states and
the foothills of the Himalayas; and Dravidians are
restricted to the southern states of India, including
Tamil Nadu, Kerala Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.
In the present study, we have analyzed microsatellite
markers from five different genes that play a major
role in cell signalling pathways and transcriptional
regulation of genes involved embryonic development.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|