
GENETIC VARIATION OF THE BRCA1 AND BRCA2
GENES IN MACEDONIAN PATIENTS Maleva I1, Madjunkova S1, Bozhinovski G1, Smickova E2, Kondov G3, Spiroski Z3,
Arsovski A4, Plaseska-Karanfilska D1,* *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Research Centre for Genetic
Engineering and Biotechnology “Georgi D. Efremov,” Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Krste
Misirkov 2, Skopje 1000, Republic of Macedonia; Tel: +389(0)2 3235410; Fax: +389 (0)2 3115434; E-mail:
dijana@manu.edu.mk page: 81
|
INTRODUCTION
The most significant and well characterized genetic
risk factors for breast and/or ovarian cancer
are germline mutations in the BRCA1 (17q chromosome)
[1] and BRCA2 (13q chromosome) [2]
genes. Other relevant genes, such as CHEK2, NBS1,
PALB2, BRIP1, etc., also contribute to hereditary
breast cancer, although their impact appears to be
more population-specific [3]. It has been estimated
that 5.0-10.0% of all breast cancer and 10.0-15.0%
of ovarian cancer patients carry mutations on one of
the BRCA genes [4]. The prevalence of the BRCA1/2
gene mutation carriers in the general population is
approximately 0.2% (1/500), however, it can vary
significantly in different countries and ethnic groups
due to founder effects [5]. The mutations in these
high-penetrance genes confer a high lifetime risk of
breast and ovarian cancer. Women with an inherited BRCA1 gene mutation have a 65.0-80.0% risk of developing
breast cancer and 37.0-62.0% of developing
ovarian cancer over their lifetime, while BRCA2 gene
mutation carriers have a 45.0-85.0% risk for breast
cancer and 11.0-23.0% for ovarian cancer [6]. The
identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation
carriers is therefore a critical step in individualized risk
assessment [7]. Once a mutation is identified in a given
family, a very informative predictive (or presymptomatic)
oncogenetic test can be offered to all adult family
members. Moreover, oncogenetic testing is becoming
the powerful therapeutic predictive tool, as new targeted
therapeutic opportunities, such as poly(ADPribose)
(PARP) inhibitors emerge [8] and chemosensitivity
to platinum-based therapy is constantly reported
[9]. It is now evident that in the near future the demand
for rapid BRCA1/2 gene mutation testing will increase.
However, a full BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene screening
still remains a labor- and time-consuming challenge
due to the large size of the genes and the high diversity
of mutations and variants of unknown significance. On
the other hand, the distribution of known BRCA1 and
BRCA2 gene mutations is well documented worldwide.
Several recent reviews have summarized the
evidence that the BRCA1/2 gene mutation spectrum in
given countries and ethnic communities is limited to a
few founder mutations [4,5,10]. To date, no systematic
study has assessed the distribution of BRCA1/2 gene
mutations in the Macedonian population. We aimed
to initiate screening for BRCA1/2 gene mutations in
order to identify the genetic variants common in the
Republic of Macedonia.
The fact that BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations
drastically increase breast cancer risk suggests
that polymorphisms in these genes could represent
low penetrance susceptibility alleles [11]. Whether
common polymorphisms contribute to disease risk
has not yet been thoroughly evaluated. The importance
of these common variants is still conflicting
and more data on large cohorts are needed to better
understand their significance. We present data
on several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
including allele frequencies and association with
breast cancer risk.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|