
CAG REPEAT NUMBER IN THE ANDROGEN RECEPTOR
GENE AND PROSTATE CANCER Madjunkova S, Eftimov A, Georgiev V, Petrovski D, Dimovski AJ, Plaseska-
Karanfi lska D, *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Dijana Plaseska-Karanfi lska, Macedonian Academy of Sciences
and Arts, Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology “Georgi D. Efremov”, Av. Krste
Misirkov 2, POB 428, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel.: +389-2-3235-410; Fax: +389-2-3115-
434; E-mail: dijana@manu.edu.mk page: 31
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
and 152 males from the general Macedonian population
for this study. Informed consent was obtained
from all and the study was approved by the
Ethic Committees of the Macedonian Academy
of Sciences and Arts and Faculty of Pharmacy,
Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. Prostate cancer
patients and those with BPH were recruited from
the Department of Urology, Medical Faculty,
Skopje, Republic of Macedonia and were referred
to the Pharmacogenetic Laboratory, Faculty of
Pharmacy, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. Only
those with histopathologically-confi rmed diagnoses
were included. The mean ages of the PC and
BPH patients were 68.19 7.36 and 69.72 .55
years, respectively. Males from the general population
were selected at the Research Center for
Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology “Georgi
D. Efremov,” Macedonian Academy of Sciences
and Arts, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia to produce
a control sample that was age-matched to the
samples of PC and BPH patients.
Methods. Genomic DNA was extracted from
EDTA whole blood following a standard phenol/
chloroform method. The CAG repeat number was
determined by fl uorescent polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) amplifi cation of exon 1 of AR gene.
Approximately 50–100 ng genomic DNA was
subjected to 35 cycles of PCR amplifi cation using
fl uorescently-labeled forward primer 5’-(HEX)
TCC AGA ATC TGT TCC AGA GCG TGC-3’ and
unlabeled reverse prime r5’-GCT GTG AAG GTT
GCT GTT CCT CA-3’. The PCR amplifi cation
was performed as follows: 45 seconds at 94C, 30
seconds at 62C and 1 min. at 72C. The size of the
PCR product was determined by capillary electrophoresis
(CE) on an ABI PRISM™ 3130 Genetic
Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA,
USA). The number of CAG repeats predicted by
the Genescan software v.6 (Applied Biosystems)
was compared with the actual CAG repeats determined
by direct dideoxy terminator cycle sequencing
using the BigDye Terminator Sequencing Kit
v1.0 (Applied Biosystems) in male DNA samples
as described previously [26].
Statistical Analyses. The frequency of the CAG
repeat alleles was compared between the studied
groups using the 2 and Fisher’s exact tests. Values
were expressed as mean standard deviation (SD).
Differences in the mean of (CAG)n length between
different groups of patients (PC, BPH) vs. controls
were tested by the independent samples t-test using
SPSS 14.0 (SPSS Chicago, IL, USA), after checking
for normal distribution. The association of different
CAG repeat length was tested at different cutoff
points: <19, <20, <21, <22 and >22. Statistical
signifi cance was defi ned as p <0.05.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|