Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics

APOE4 STATUS AND COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN MIDDLE-AGED AND ELDERLY PEOPLE
Pavel N.A.1, Paun M.R.2, Matei P.V.1,2, Dutu I.1, Tudose C.1,2
*Corresponding Author: Valentin P. Matei, Associate Proffesor, MD, PhD. 2nd Ward of “Prof. Dr. Alexandru Obregia” Hospital, Berceni Street no 10, Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: valipmatei@yahoo.com
page: 6
download article in pdf format

Abstract

Introduction: APOE is one of the prominent genes involved in the increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, but its effect on cognition in patients who are not yet diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment is relatively understudied. We aimed to examine the effect of ApoE4 on cognitive performance in unimpaired middleaged and elderly persons. Materials and methods: Our study included 51 cognitively unimpaired participants divided into ApoE4 positive patients and controls by APOE genotyping. The following clinical and demographic characteristics were collected: age, gender, education, social status, BMI, history of medical or psychiatric disorders. Patients with current anxiety or depressive disorders were excluded. Cognitive function was evaluated using MMSE, Rey Auditory- Verbal Learning Test, Rey Complex Figure test, TMT A and B and verbal fluency test. The two groups were matched for age, sex, and education. Categorial data was analyzed using Chi-Square and continuous data using Student-T test (parametric variables) or Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric variables). Statistical significance was considered at p≤.05. Results: There were 11 (21.6%) ApoE4 positive patients and 40 (78.4%) controls. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. The ApoE4 positive group performed slightly worse on cognitive evaluations compared to controls but only the mean scores of the Rey Complex Figure Test – Memory reached statistical significance (p=.019). Conclusion: Cognitive evaluation generally rendered lower scores in the ApoE4 group compared to the control group. However, only visual memory impairment scores were significantly lower in the ApoE4 positive individuals than in controls.

Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022	Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021	Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019	Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement	Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018	Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017	Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016	Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015	Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014	Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013	Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012	Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012	Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics	Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010	Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009	Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008	Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007	Number 10 10 (1),2007
Number 9 1&2, 2006	Number 9 3&4, 2006
Number 8 1&2, 2005	Number 8 3&4, 2004
Number 7 1&2, 2004	Number 6 3&4, 2003
Number 6 1&2, 2003	Number 5 3&4, 2002
Number 5 1&2, 2002	Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999	Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4 3&4, 2001	Number 4 1&2, 2001
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000	Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998	Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998	Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000	Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998

About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact