
VALUE OF OPTICAL GENOME MAPPING (OGM) FOR DIAGNOSTICS OF RARE DISEASES: A FAMILY CASE REPORT Kovanda A1,2, Miljanović O3, Lovrečić L1,2, Maver A1,2, Hodžić A1,2, Peterlin B1,2,* *Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Prof. Borut Peterlin, Clinical Institute of Genomic Medicine, University
Medical Centre Ljubljana, Šlajmerjeva 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. borut.peterlin@kclj.si page: 87 download article in pdf format
|
Abstract
Optical genome mapping (OGM) is a novel method
enabling the detection of structural genomic variants. The
method is based on the laser image acquisition of single,
labeled, high-molecular-weight DNA molecules and can
detect structural genomic variants such as translocations,
inversions, insertions, deletions, duplications, and com-
plex structural rearrangements. We aim to present our
experience with OGM at the Clinical Institute of Genomic
Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Since its introduction in 2021, we have used OGM for
the testing of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
1, characterization and resolution of variants identified
by other technologies such as microarrays, exome and
genome next-generation sequencing, karyotyping, as well
as testing of rare disease patients in whom no genetic cause
could be identified using these methods.
We present an example family case of two previously
undiagnosed male siblings with an overlapping clinical
presentation of thrombocytopenia, obesity, and presacral
teratoma. After karyotyping, microarray analysis and
next-generation sequencing, by using OGM, a maternally
inherited cryptic translocation t(X;18)(q27.1;q12.2) was
identified in both brothers. Despite an extended segrega-
tion analysis, based on strictly applied ACMG criteria and
ClinGen guidelines, the identified translocation remains
a variant of unknown significance. Despite the remaining
limitations of OGM, which will hopefully be resolved by
improvements in databases of known benign SV variation
and the establishment of official guidelines on the clinical
interpretation of OGM variants, our work highlights the
complexity of the diagnostic journey, including this novel
method, in rare disease cases.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|