
COEXISTENCE OF A COMMON PROTHROMBOTIC
RISK FACTOR AND HEMOPHILIA IN THE
BULGARIAN HEMOPHILIC POPULATION:
GENOTYPE/PHENOTYPE CORRELATIONS
Petkova R1, Chakarov S2, Horvath A3, Ganev V3, Kremensky I1 *Corresponding Author: Dr. Rumena Petkova, Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology “Maichin dom’, No 2 Zdrave Str, 1432 Sofia, Bulgaria; Tel: +359 2 952 049 0; Fax: +359 2 952 012 4; E-mail: RumenaPetkova@yahoo.com page: 37
|
RESULTS
We have investigated 31 Bulgarian patients suffering from severe hemophilia A and B below 1%, as determined by factor VIII and factor IX activity levels, respectively. Three hemophilia A patients (10%) had surprisingly mild presentation, manifested by fewer bleeding episodes. One of these patients had a maternal cousin suffering from a full-blown severe form of hemophilia A. One patient, with a milder clinical course, had never needed either plasma or factor VIII infusions, even though his factor VIII level was below 1%. Two hemophilia A patients with low levels of factor VIII but a mild clinical course, shared a common molecular defect in the factor VIII gene, a large inversion disrupting the gene, resulting in virtually nonexistent factor VIII activity.
No thrombotic episodes have been reported among these three patients thus far, although one patient was 60 years of age at the time of investigation. The milder clinical phenotype was not found to be associated with lack of arthropathy because the milder bleeding tendency was manifested exclusively by a decrease in the number of bleeding incidents. Arthropathy was apparent in older patients.
Heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation (G1691A) was found in one pediatric patient who did not display amelioration in the clinical phenotype. His bleeding disorder became obvious in early infancy. Up to the present time, he has had several bleeding episodes and frequently needs treatment with factor VIII preparations. No thrombotic episodes have been reported so far.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|