MINOR PHENOTYPIC FEATURES HELPED TO DIAGNOSE THE XYY SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT
Sukarova-Angelovska E*, Kocova M, Ilieva G, Angelova D, Sredovska A
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Elena Sukarova-Angelovska, Pediatric Clinic, Medical Faculty, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel.: +38970358582; Fax: +3892313224; E-mail: ESukarova@doctor.com
page: 63

DISCUSSION

The 47, XYY syndrome was first described in 1961 [9]. Since then, many cases have been reported, mostly in late childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. The reason for delayed detection is a lack of specific dysmorphic signs. Mental disability varies from case to case, ranging from normal to an IQ of 70. Most cases were evaluated because of specific behavioral problems at school, or later in life, because of tall stature beyond their target height [10]. Moreover, larger craniofacial dimensions than normal (vault, facial height, chin) can raise suspicion for this syndrome. Ellis et al. [11] suggested the important role of Y-specific growth genes, which promote growth in 47, XYY individuals.
Urogenital malformations causing olygohydramnios and, consequently Potter sequence (microbrachycephaly, flat face, wide-spaced eyes, large and poorly developed ears, abnormal positioning of hands and feet, pulmonary hypoplasia) are reported to be more frequent than normal [12]. It has been suggested that newborns having Potter sequence of unknown origin should be checked for the 47,XYY karyotype.
Many minor features described in the literature were present in our patient. The presence of minor dysmorphic features in our case, although non specific, is described in different cases in the literature. The difficulty of regular detection of this syndrome is mentioned by many authors due to the different combination of signs. Many cases were detected by chance. However, a combination of mental retardation and stature higher than predicted, can raise the suspicion for the syndrome.
Most XYY individuals have borderline intelligence, while some are mildly retarded. A higher degree of mental retardation is associated with a higher number of behavioral problems [13]. Adequate specialist training and counseling of the family could provide sufficient control of the antisocial behavior.
A relationship between autistic and violent behavior and XYY syndrome is still controversial. The frequent presence of persons with XYY syndrome in prisons and correctional institutions associates this chromosomal disorder with violent behavior. About 1% of male prisoners have the XYY karyotype, an incidence higher than that found in the newborn population [14]. However, these prisoners are reported to commit mainly misdemeanors such as theft, fighting, burglary, drug abuse and only rarely serious crimes such as murder [15]. Other psychiatric disorders such as pervasive developmental disorders [16], autism [17], and schizophrenia [18] have been described. The biochemical effects of the double dosage of gene products on the Y chromosome on the behavioral and psychiatric disorders is still unknown [19], but the extra Y chromosome may be related to abnormal brain development [16]. The question of whether such individuals should be declared not guilty for medical reasons in criminal proceedings is still unsolved [15].
Our patient had some degree of aggressive behavior. However, it is difficult to attribute it to the XYY phenotype since his father was also prone to violent behavior.
This syndrome has been referred in association with fragile X syndrome [20], congenital heart disease [4], Prader-Willi syndrome [21], and myotonic dystrophy [22]. Such associations appear to be coincidental, and do not depend on presence of the XYY chromosome complement.
Unlike other trisomies, where the abnormality occurs during maternal meiosis I, in XYY syndrome, the error occurs during paternal meiosis [23]. In most cases, the non-disjunction occurs during paternal meiosis II, but in some it occurs during the first mitotic divisions in the embryo [24].
Conventional cytogenetics is a standard method for detection of the chromosomal abnormality. The FISH analysis with a fluorochrome-labeled, chromosome-specific DNA probe, is also used as a complementary technique to detect the origin of the marker chromosome, to detect low rate mosaicism in a large number of cells, as well as XX and XY disomy in spermia during in vitro fertilization procedures, as it is impossible to detect aneu­ploidy in non-dividing cells with conventional karyo­typing [5].
The XYY individuals have normal genitalia and normal sexual development, except in some cases where cryptorchidism and hypospadias have been described [7]. However, hypospermia and infertility have been reported [25,26]. The 47, XYY individuals frequently have normal offspring, since the extra Y chromosomes in the disomic spermatozoa have usually been lost during spermato­genesis, mostly in pachytene during meiosis 1, and in the remaining disomic spermatogonia, during postreductional divisions [6,27]. Many studies reported a wide range for the percentage of disomic sperm in XYY individuals, varying from 0.3% [28] to15% [29], but most of them average around 1% [5,30]. Their offspring have slightly increased risk for gonosomal and autosomal aneuploidy than average and should be examined.
Follow-up of XYY children will provide information for assessment of their quality of life and of their fertility rate. Since 47, XYY is detected more frequently prenatally, this information would help future parents in making the decision of whether to terminate the pregnancy. It is worth noting that the rate of pregnancy termination of these fetuses is steadily declining [31-33].




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006