
ASSOCIATION OF THE HEMOCHROMATOSIS H63D ALLELE WITH SEVERE OLIGOZOOSPERMIA Plaseski T1,2, Dimitrovski C2, Kocevska B2, Efremov GD1, Plaseska-Karanfilska D1,* *Corresponding Author: Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, MD, PhD, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Av. Krste Misirkov 2, POB 428, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia; Tel: +389 2 3235 410; Fax: +389 2 3115 434; E-mail: di-jana@manu.edu.mk page: 57
|
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Materials. Two hundred and five infertile/subfertile men and a control group of 145 proven fathers were included in this study. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. On the basis of their semen analysis, the subjects were categorized into six groups: azoospermia (n = 77); severe oligozoospermia, sperm counts £1.0 x 106/mL (n = 34); moderate oligozoospermia, sperm counts 1-5 x 106/m (n = 16); mild oligozoospermia, sperm counts 5-20 x 106/m (n = 22); normozoospermia (n = 40) and patients with a known cause of infertility – azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and chromosome abnormalities (XXY and XX males) (n = 16). The control group consisted of 145 men who have fathered at least one child and whose paternity was proven by DNA analysis.
Methods. Semen analyses were performed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [17]. DNA was isolated from leukocytes using a Proteinase K/SDS digestion-phenol/chloroform extraction-ethanol precipitation method [18]. Exons 2 and 4 of the HFE gene containing the H63D and C282 mutations were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using oligonucleotide primer sequences, as reported previously [6]. Aliquots of amplified products were digested with RsaI and BclI restriction enzymes to detect the C282 and H63D mutations, respectively. The detection of the HFE H63D mutation by PCR and BclI digestion, followed by agarose gel electrophoresis, is shown in Figure 1.
Chi square and Fisher’s exact test were used to determine the significance of the differences in the frequencies of the HFE H63D mutation between the various groups of subjects studied. The associations with a value of p <0.05 were considered to be significant.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|