
THE STUDY OF X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION IN
MENTAL RETARDATION: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF
MOLECULAR-CYTOGENETIC AND POLYMERASE CHAIN
REACTION-BASED TECHNIQUES IN RETT SYNDROME
Iourov IY1, Vorsanova SG2,*, Villard L3, Kolotii AD2, Yurov YB1,* *Corresponding Author: Professor Yuri B. Yurov and Professor Svetlana G. Vorsanova, Cytogenetic Labora¬tory National Center of Mental Health, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Zagorodnoe shosse 2, Moscow 113 152, Russia; Tel.: +7-095-952-89-90; Fax: +7-095-952-89-40; E-mail: y_yurov@hotmail.com; y_yurov@yahoo. com
page: 33
|
RESULTS
Thirty-three samples of peripheric blood lymphocytes, obtained from RTT girls and their parents, were analyzed by FISH with chromosome X-specific alphoid probe (pYAM10-40). In cells of eight RTT girls (24.2%) homologous highly heteromorphic chromosomes X were found. In metaphase and interphase, one X chromosome had large or medium hybridization signals and the other chromosome contained a very small hybridization signal (Fig. 1) This provided us with the possibility to accurately mark and differentiate the parental chromosome X. Chromosomal preparations of an RTT girl’s parents were analyzed to determine the paternal or maternal origin of chromosome X with alphoid DNA heteromorphism. Five girls had X chromosomes with small centromeric heteromorphism of paternal origin and three of maternal origin. The data of molecular-cytogenetic assays are shown in Table 1. According to the molecular-cytogenetic study, one girl had random X-inactivation (55:45), four girls had moderate X-inactivation (from 63:37 to 74:26), and three girls had extremely skewed X-inactivation (more than 80:20).
We have performed a PCR-based methylation sensitive method for determining X-inactivation skewing on peripheric blood lymphocytes of the eight RTT girls. The results of HpaII digestion and PCR are presented in Fig. 2.
The data obtained and comparison of the two methods applied are presented in Table 1. There is good correlation of the results obtained by these two independent methods for X-inactivation analysis. Using molecucular-cytogenetic and replication pattern analysis of active/inactive X chromosomes, we have found that active X chromosomes have paternal origin in seven cases and maternal in one case of RTT girls (Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison of the results obtained by two X-inactivation assays (PCR-based and FISH methods) in eight patients with Rett syndrome.
Patient |
MECP2
Mutation |
PCR
Results |
FISH
Results |
Status of
X-Inactivation |
Chromosome X
Active/Inactive Origin |
1 |
T197M |
51:49 |
55:45 |
random |
maternal:paternal |
2 |
R255X |
76:24 |
74:26 |
moderately skewed |
paternal:maternal |
3 |
T158M |
69:31 |
62:38 |
moderately skewed |
paternal:maternal |
4 |
no mutation |
85:15 |
82:18 |
extremely skewed |
paternal:maternal |
5 |
R168M |
90:10 |
91:9 |
extremely skewed |
paternal:maternal |
6 |
no mutation |
60:40 |
64:36 |
moderately skewed |
paternal:maternal |
7 |
P388T |
95:5 |
91:9 |
extremely skewed |
paternal:maternal |
8 |
no mutation |
61:39 |
69:31 |
moderately skewed |
paternal:maternal |
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|