
DELINEATION OF PARTIAL CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES IN EARLY PREGNANCY LOSSES Bozhinovski Gj1, Terzikj M1, Kubelka-Sabit K2,3, Plaseska-Karanfilska D1,* *Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Prof. Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, M.D., Ph.D. Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology “Georgi D. Efremov,” Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Krste Misirkov 2, 1000, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia. Tel: +389-2-3235-410 E-mail: dijana@manu.edu.mk page: 23
|
RESULTS
General findings
To investigate the genomic landscape of the previ-
ously detected partial chromosomal abnormalities in EPLs
with QF-PCR and subtelomeric MLPA methods, we have
performed array CGH analysis on a total of 20 samples.
All 30 previously detected chromosomal abnormali-
ties among the 20 studied EPLs were confirmed and 2
additional chromosomal abnormalities previously not
detected with QF-PCR and subtelomeric MLPA methods
were revealed. These additional abnormalities were out of
the ligation sites of the used subtelomeric MLPA probes,
therefore they were not detected previously.
Among the 20 investigated samples, the total num-
ber of detected partial chromosomal abnormalities was
32, of which 18 (56% of all detected abnormalities) were
deletions and 14 were duplications (44%). Nine samples
had single partial chromosomal abnormality, 10 samples
carried double abnormalities, while one sample carried
three partial abnormalities. All the characterized abnor-
malities were on distal chromosomal sites, except one
sample which had an additional aberration located proxi-
mally (7q22.1q34) of the expected single chromosomal
abnormality on chromosome 7q36, previously not de-
tected with the QF-PCR and subtelomeric MLPA meth-
ods. Also, another sample with deletion on 1p region and
duplication on 1q region detected previously by MLPA,
was found to carry an additional duplication involving the
1p36.32p36.31 chromosomal region. Schematic presenta-
tion of the detected chromosomal abnormalities among the
affected chromosomes is shown on Figure 1. The sizes of the abnormalities ranged from 1.04 Mb to 150.21 Mb, with
average size of 33.2 Mb. Detailed genomic locations of the
detected partial chromosomal abnormalities is presented in
Table 1 and the gene content of the detected abnormalities
is described in Supplementary Table 1.
Chromosome 1 exhibited the highest frequency of
abnormalities, with six of the detected alterations mapped
to this chromosome. Chromosome 18 was the second most
affected, harboring four abnormalities, followed by chro-
mosome 13 with three abnormalities.
Recurrent chromosomal regions
and GO enrichment analysis
To identify significant CNV regions and to determine
the molecular functions and biological processes of the
genes contained in these regions who are associated with
early pregnancy loss (EPL), we first focused on recurrent
regions (>2) among the 32 detected partial chromosomal
alterations determining the SOR regions.
With this approach, we identified a total of six recur-
rent events. The most common recurrent event was on the
terminal part of the chromosome 1p, with SOR of 1.78 Mb
in the 1p36.33-p36.32 regions, shared by five deletions/
duplications Common recurrent events were found on the
terminal part of chromosomes 18q (SOR of 22.1 Mb in the
18q21.31-q23 region) and chromosome 13q (SOR of 14.02
in the 13q32.3-q34 region). With two recurrent events were
chromosomes 6q, 9p and 11q, with SOR of 48.26 Mb in
the 6q22.31-q27 region, SOR of 8.88 Mb in the 9p24.3-
p23 region and SOR of 7.38 Mb in the 11q24.2q25 region. Schematic presentation of the SOR regions is presented on
Figure 2. The OMIM genes in every recurrent abnormality
were identified and the respective diseases caused by those
genes were paired. The most common disorders caused by
the identified genes were multisystem syndromes, which
may explain their pathogenicity in early human develop-
ment. The OMIM genes and the associated disorders are
shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was con-
ducted using Panther, and significantly enriched GO terms
were visualized through bar plots (Figures 3 and 4). The
analysis revealed that the genes are predominantly associ-
ated with molecular binding activities, enzymatic functions
as catalytic molecules, or ATPase activity.
In terms of biological processes, the recurrent genes
identified in this study primarily encode proteins involved
in essential functions such as biological regulation, cellular
processes, and metabolic processes (Figure 4). Further-
more, several genes within the affected regions were linked
to developmental processes, indicating that their dysfunc-
tion could contribute to early developmental abnormalities,
potentially leading to pregnancy loss.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|