
IGHV MUTATIONAL STATUS IN A COHORT OF BULGARIAN CLL PATIENTS: HIGH UNMUTATED CLL PREVALENCE IN NORTH-EAST BULGARIA Yosifova A, Micheva I, Donchev M, Tincheva S, Ormandjiev S,
Genova J, Pavlova Z, Todorova A *Corresponding Author: Angelina Yosifova, Genetic Medico-Diagnostic Laboratory “Genica”, Sofia,
Bulgaria. Email: andjim91@gmail.com; Phone: +359888979313 page: 15
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present prospective study includes a total of 105
newly diagnosed CLL patients (72 males and 33 females)
at the ages of 38-80 years from different Bulgarian regions.
To the best of our knowledge, all of them have previously
tested negative by FISH for 17p13 deletion, and none of
them have received treatment prior to IGHV testing. All
patient samples were obtained after signing an informed
consent form.
Samples collection and cells extraction: IGHV muta-
tional status was determined by PCR/Sanger sequencing on
genomic DNA (gDNA) or complementary DNA (cDNA)
extracted from venous blood mononuclear cells collected
in EDTA tubes. During the whole process of testing, ERIC
Recommendations were strictly followed [6].
Mononuclear cells were obtained after density gradi-
ent separation by FiColl-Paque PLUS with some in-house
modifications: after gradient centrifugation, the mononu-
clear cell pellet formed between the upper plasma layer and
FiColl fraction was dissolved in Dulbecco’s Phosphate-
Buffered Saline (D-PBS 1x – calcium and magnesium
free), instead of Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI
1640 Medium 1x).
Total DNA/RNA was extracted from collected mono-
nuclear cells. The preferred target for us is gDNA be-
cause there is no need for a reverse transcription step.
High molecular weight gDNA was extracted by QIAGEN
- QIAmp ® DNA Blood kit following the manufacture’s
instructions. Total RNA (extracted by ZYMO Research -
Quick-RNA Viral kit), followed by cDNA synthesis (Sensi-
FAST cDNA Synthesis Kit) was used only in 9 problematic
cases, in which gDNA amplification showed unproductive
rearrangements or poor quality of the sequencing profile.
Following ERIC recommendations, the PCR ampli-
fication was performed with leader primers in a multiplex
reaction. In rare cases (n=3 patients), the amplification
of the clonotypic IG rearrangement was successful only
by utilization of internal IGHV FR1 (framework) prim-
ers (Figure 2). In all 3 cases the amplification with the
leader primers failed. Consensus primers targeting the
IGHJ genes were used in reverse direction. These results
were interpreted with caution, because FR1 primers do
not amplify the entire V region [7].
The PCR amplification was performed with primers
and protocols, according to ERIC recommendations and
BIOMED2 [8,9].
The analysis of the rearranged IG sequences in FAS-
TA format was performed with the IMGT/V-QUEST tool
[10]. Cases with ≥98% identity were considered unmu-
tated, while those with a homology less than 98% - mu-
tant type, and cases were considered borderline when the
homology is between 97-97.99% [11].
BCR stereotyped subsets were determined by AR-
ResT/AssignSubsets online tool [12, 13].
Statistical analysis for correlation was performed by
using Fisher’s Exact Test.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|