
MISDIAGNOSIS OF TRACHER-COLLINS SYNDROME INITIALLY ATTRIBUTED TO DRUG TERATOGENICITY: A MOROCCAN CASE REPORT Lamzouri A, EL Rherbi A, Ratbi I, Laarabi FZ, Chahboune R, Elalaoui SC, Hamdaoui H, Bencheikh RS, Sefiani *Corresponding Author: Afaf Lamzouri (MD, Ass. Prof.): Department of Medical Genetics and Oncogenetics, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tangier, BP 365 km 15 Gzenaya Tangier, Morocco. Fax: 05.39.39.21.46. Phone number: 00 212 6 10 77 79 59. Email: lamzouriafaf@hotmail.com / lamzouriafaf82@gmail.com / a.lamzouri@uae.ac.ma page: 69
|
CASE PRESENTATION
The patient is a 7-year-old male, first child of Moroc-
can consanguineous parents (first-degree), aged of 29-year-
old for the mother and 37-year-old for the father. Preg-
nancy and delivery were normal, and the child was born at
term with normal physical measurements. The mother had
no history of abdominal trauma or radiographic examina-
tion, but she had been taking an antidepressant treatment
based on trimipramine Surmontil ® during the first two
months of pregnancy. The child had normal psychomotor
development and has been schooled with good follow-up.
Upon general examination at 7 years, the patient’s
body weight was 23 Kg (50th percentile), head circum-
ference 45 cm (50th percentile), and height 123 cm (70th
percentile). He was dysmorphic with coloboma of the
lower eyelids, downslanting palpebral fissures, missing
eyelashes, and bilateral symmetrical hypoplasia of the
zygomatic bones (Fig. 1). The rest of his physical examina-
tion was normal; in particular, he has no ear abnormalities.
Ophthalmological examination revealed a corneal ulcer
with palpebral coloboma, otorhinolaryngol-scopic and
dental examinations were normal.
From the very first months of their child’s life, the
parents keenly observed facial dysmorphia. Upon seek-
ing medical advice, the consulting pediatrician attributed
this dysmorphia to the antidepressant treatment that the
mother had undergone during her pregnancy. At that time,
neither a genetic consultation nor a pharmacovigilance
assessment was sought.
The attribution of the child’s condition to the mother’s
medication has precipitated profoundly distressing psycho-
logical and social consequences. This includes a deteriora-
tion in the mother’s depressive syndrome, characterized by
self-blame, self-indignation, and a substantial decline in
her self-esteem. Adding to her distress, the child’s father
has consistently expressed a threat of divorce, associat-
ing the mother with misfortune, even extending to their
own child.
It was not until the child reached the age of seven that
the mother, realizing the existence of a national pharmacovigilance center, made the decision to formally report
her child’s case. Her primary motivation was to share her
personal ordeal and to raise awareness about the potential
risks associated with the medication.
Upon receiving the case report, the physician con-
ducted a causality assessment using the French method of
imputability study [2]. To establish a comprehensive semi-
otic score and eliminate potential differential diagnoses, a
genetic consultation was deemed necessary. Consequently,
a genetic consultation was sought, ultimately leading to
the accurate rectification of the etiological diagnosis of
dysmorphia. According to the French method for assessing
the causality of adverse drug reactions, the pharmacologist
assigned a level of doubt regarding the drug’s origin, as
indicated by an Intrinsec Score of I2. The chronological
score was noted as C2, and the semiological score as S1.
The extrinsic score, designated as B1, was based on the
available data for trimipramine, which although limited,
appeared to suggest the absence of a specific malforma-
tion risk associated with trimipramine antidepressants [3].
During the parental evaluation, it was observed that
the father exhibited discreet coloboma and mild hypoplasia
of the zygomatic bones.
Treacher Collins syndrome was considered a potential
diagnosis due to the presence of characteristic dysmorphic
features and a family history consistent with autosomal
dominant inheritance. Prior to conducting genetic studies,
informed consent was obtained from the proband’s parents.
The genetic testing conducted involved a multigene
panel, including genes TCOF1, POLR1B, POLR1C, and
POLR1D. The results revealed a heterozygous frameshift
mutation NM_001371623.1(TCOF1): c.4372_4376del
(p.Lys1458fs) in exon 24 of the TCOF1 gene for the pro-
band.
However, the father declined to participate in the
genetic study, as he was unwilling to accept that he could
be the carrier of the disease.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|