INDICATIONS FOR REFERRAL OF TURNER’S SYNDROME CASES DIAGNOSED PRENATALLY
Yilmaz B1,*, Ozkinay F2, Ercal D3, Sagol S4, Kanit H5, Kirayoglu H1, Ozkinay C2
*Corresponding Author: Assistant Professor Dr. Berna Yilmaz, Gene-Test Genetic Diagnostic Centre, Talatpasa Bulv. No: 33/6, 35520 Alsancak-Izmir, Turkey; Tel.: +90-232-463-45-45; Fax: +90-232-464-65-33; E-mail: bernaylmz@hotmail.com
page: 27

DISCUSSION

Several studies have established a relationship between indications for prenatal diagnosis and abnormal cytogenetic test results of sex chromosome abnormalities [5,7,9]. Thus, Brun et al. [7] found abnormal ultrasonog­raphy findings in 41 out of 96 fetuses with sex chromosome aneuploidy cases, and Baena et al. [9] reported that the most frequent abnormal ultrasonography findings were cystic hygroma (59.5%) and hydrops fetalis (19%) in 125 TS cases. Bronshtein et al. [5] have shown that cystic hygroma, hydrops fetalis and subcutaneous edema were highly predictive of TS in early pregnancy. Our smaller study confirms that the most common indications for fetal chromosomal analysis are cystic hygroma and hydrops fetalis, however, the frequency of fetuses having these abnormalities is slightly lower, probably because of the number of cases available.
Drummond et al. [10] found nine fetuses with chromosomal abnormality among 130 pregnancies that underwent invasive testing after 28 weeks gestation. One of these fetuses with a chromosomal abnormality had the 45,X0 karyotype and hydrops fetalis, with a cardiac abnormality as the ultrosonographic findings.
Among our TS cases, 82.35% had a non mosaic karyotype. The frequency of non mosaic karyotypes has been reported at 60 to 81% of TS diagnosed prenatally [2,3,9,11].
Turner’s syndrome cases with a mosaic karyotype do not usually show abnormal prenatal ultrasonography findings [4,5,11]. Thus, Huang et al.[11] observed intrauterine growth retardation in only one of the 17 mosaic fetuses with TS. None of our three mosaic TS fetuses showed prenatal ultrasonography findings supporting the previous reports.
Most cases of 45,X0/46,XY mosaicism are thought to be caused by nondisjunction of the Y chromosome after normal disomic fertilization [12,13]. In over 90% of such cases, diagnosed prenatally, a normal male phenotype was found by several authors [14,15,16]. Genetic counseling for such mosaic patients is problematic as there is a 10% risk of abnormality [17]. Unfortunately, our case of 45,X0/ 46,XY mosaicism was lost to follow-up.
Most prenatally diagnosed fetuses with TS are legally aborted in most countries [3,7,8].The termination rate can be changed by the genetic counseling given by professionals [7]. Higher termination rates have been observed among couples with a higher mean number of previous children [8]. The termination rate in our pregnancies diagnosed with 45,X0 were 100% after genetic counseling. One of the mosaic cases spontaneously aborted after amniocentesis, while the other two cases were lost to follow-up. We suggest that fetal karyotyping be performed in pregnancies in which there are abnormal ultrasound findings.




Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006