
SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS IN A CHILD WITH SUCCINIC SEMIALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE DEFICIENCY Parezanović M, Ilić N, Ostojić S, Stevanović G, Ječmenica J, Maver A, Sarajlija A *Corresponding Author: Adrijan Sarajlija MD, PhD, Clinical Genetics Outpatient Clinic, Mother and Child Health Care Institute “Dr Vukan Čupić”, Radoja Dakića 6-8, 11070 Novi Beograd, Serbia; e-mail: adrijans2004@yahoo.com page: 63
|
DISCUSSION
The first description of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase
deficiency is found in Jakobs et al. from 1981,
followed by the elucidation of its genetic basis and aggregation
of significant amount of data reflecting its clinical
spectrum.1,4,12 Numerous pathogenic variants in ALDH5A1
associated with SSADH deficiency have been reported,
but precise genotype-phenotype correlation was not yet
established.2,13 Additionally, the relationship between the
genetic change and residual succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase
activities lacked consistency.2
Due to its heterogeneous and often non-specific clinical
presentation, SSADH deficiency may be significantly
underdiagnosed. Onset of the symptoms has been reported
at a median of 11 months of age, while the delay of definitive
diagnosis is estimated at 5-6 years.14-16 In the case of
our patient, hypotonia was noticeable in early infancy. The
course of the disease remained non-progressive, despite
the notion that some SSADH deficiency patients with early
onset have severe complications including extrapyramidal
signs, seizures, regression and even death in infancy. In the
case of our patient, hypotonia and global developmental
delay are the hallmarks of the disease from the beginning.
Up to the age of five years, our patient has remained
seizure free.
Quality of life for SSADH deficiency patients could
be significantly reduced in cases of pronounced neuropsychiatric
problems, among which a lack of attention
and aggressive behavior begin in early childhood while
disabling obsessive-compulsive disorder occur mostly in
adolescence and adulthood.7-9 Similar manifestations have
not been encountered yet in the boy we present, apart from
a single visit to the pediatric emergency department at the
age of four years due to unexplained agitation lasting for
several hours. Given moderate sleeping difficulties, our
patient is using melatonin with good results. A clinical
severity scoring (CSS) system was recently proposed for
evaluating SSADH patients, based on cognitive aspects,
communication skills, motor function, epilepsy, and psychiatric
aspect of the disease.17 The CSS ranges from 5-25
(average (17.3), with higher scores correlating with milder
presentation. Our patient’s score of 17 at 5 years of age
is almost the exact average of the SSADH patients group
involved in study that established the CSS. The presence of
SNHL in our patient, however, contributes indirectly to his
CSS result, affecting primarily his communication skills.
A diagnostic procedure which usually provides
SSADH deficiency suspicion is the analysis of urinary
organic acids. In SSADH deficiency patients, this test typically
shows a multifold increase of GHB concentration.
Failure to identify GHB in urine by the gas chromatography–
mass spectrometry method in our patient could be attributed
to inadequate sampling or other technical reasons
for false negativity. However, repeated measurements in
urine were performed by the experienced biochemist in
the national reference metabolic laboratory. This biochemist
has been engaged for decades in the external quality
assurance scheme provided by the European Research
Network for the evaluation and improvement of screening,
diagnosis and treatment of inherited disorders of metabolism
(ERNDIM). In our experience, a negative GHB
finding in the analysis of urinary organic acids, should
not exclude the possibility of SSADH deficiency. Whole
exome sequencing proved to be an efficient and accurate
diagnostic method in this case, with a turnaround time of
approximately 3 months. Brain MRI findings in SSADH
patients reveal characteristic signs of hyperintensity of
the globus pallidus, cerebellar dentate nucleus, and subthalamic
nucleus. These lesions are typically bilateral and
symmetrical. In the case of our patient, at 20 months of age,
a standard brain MRI did show incomplete myelination
and higher signal intensity in both globi pallidi. The absence
of biochemical marker typical of SSADH deficiency,
suggestive MRI findings should prompt the diagnostic
pursuit of this disorder with an option for targeting the
next generation sequencing method.
Homozygosity for the pathogenic missense variant
(NM_170740:c.1265G>A) in ALDH5A1 gave us decisive
information about the etiology of our patient’s disease,
but it failed to explain the sensorineural hearing loss.
There have been reports of the same genotype resulting
in severely decreased SSADH activity (less than 1% of
normal).12-13 Patients homozygous for c.1265G>A were
reported from diverse ethnic backgrounds with a variable
degree of developmental delay (ranging from mild to severe)
and high prevalence of epilepsy (including cases of
sudden unexpected death in epilepsy – SUDEP).18 However,
the association of ALDH5A1 gene variants and hearing
impairment has not been described so far, with some
of the authors stating that the findings of auditory work-up
were normal.19 Evidence suggest that central auditory processing
depends on a delicate balance between excitatory
and inhibitory neurotransmission and that GABA plays an
important role in this process. More specifically, hearing
impairment has been linked to the decrease of GABAergic
transmission in elderly, both in presbycusis and other
age-related auditory disturbances.20 Increased presence of
GABA and GHB in patients with SSADH deficiency apparently
contradicts this mechanism. However, excessive
concentrations of accumulated GABA and GBH are known
to cause a down-regulation of GABA receptors, which
could have an adverse influence on hearing function.21,22 It
should be noted that neuroanatomic studies emphasized the
role of basal ganglia in auditory categorization and speech
perception.23 A recent brain MRI study did not show any
significant differences in the volume of globi pallidi and
microstructure in children with sensorineural hearing loss,
compared to scans of children with preserved hearing.24 In
several inborn errors of metabolism, sensorineural hearing
loss could be present simultaneously with basal ganglia
impairment, but a clear pathophysiologic link is missing.
25 However, the prevalence of sensorineural hearing
loss was found to be significantly higher in patients with
glutaric aciduria type 1 treated in intensive care units for
metabolic crises.26 One of the hallmarks of glutaric aciduria
type 1 is the presence of abnormally high signal in globi
pallidi detected by MRI.27 Moreover, decreased functional
connectivity in ipsilateral globus pallidus was found in
patients with unilateral hearing loss by the use of resting
state functional connectivity MRI.28
Initial BERA findings at the age of one showed bilateral
sensorineural hearing damage with the elements
relatable to the delayed myelination of the central nervous
structures. Control BERA findings at the age of two
revealed specific mid-frequencies sensorineural hearing
loss. The “cookie bite” type audiogram is a pattern that
suggests hereditary component of the hearing loss. These
findings dismissed some of the frequent causes of hearing
damage, such as perinatal asphyxia or congenital infections.
13,14 In this specific case, secondary WES findings
included heterozygous variants of uncertain significance
in genes TECTA, MYH14, DIAPH1 and CHD7 but their
potential modifying effect contributing to the occurrence
of hearing loss could not be confirmed.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|