
DOUBLE ISOCHROMOSOME X,
A RARE CYTOGENETIC VARIANT OF TURNER SYNDROME:
A CASE REPORT AND A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Zerrouki K.1,2, Babakhouya A.1,3, Tajir M.1,2 *Corresponding Author: Khawla Zerrouki; Address: Medical Genetics Laboratory, Mohammed VI University
Hospital, BP 4806 Oujda University, 60049 Oujda, Morocco. Phone number: +212642540172;
E-mail: khawlazerroukii@gmail.com page: 4
|
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Isochromosome X is a structural chromosomal abnormality
of the X chromosome that consists of two copies
of either the p arm or the q arm, derived by centromere
division (5). This results in an abnormal X chromosome
whose two arms are genetically identical and causes TS.
The most common isochromosome observed in the literature
is the isochromosome for the long arm of the X
chromosome (6). With or without mosaicism, its frequency
was reported to be 15-18% in TS cases (7).
To our knowledge, the double i(X) is a very rare entity,
described less than 10 times in the literature. The
percentage of double i(X) ranges from 5% in Howell et
al. to 36% in Melaragno et al. (8,9). The percentage of
double i(X) is 26 % in our case (Table 1).
The absence of a normal population 46,XX indicates
that the formation of i(X) occurred during meiosis by an
isochromatid break and fusion of the daughter chromatids
above the centromere or, by transverse division instead of
longitudinal division of the centromere during cell division
(10). We noticed that in all previously reported cases of
TS with double i(X), the isochromosomes were dicentrics.
This suggests that mosaicism is a consequence of
the instability of the dicentric chromosomes (9). We could
pretend, in our case, that the i(X) is dicentric resulting in
fusion of daughter chromatids. The segregation of the
chromosome during cell division is normal due to one
of the two centromeres of the dicentric isochromosome
usually becoming non-functional (5) . However, in this
case, there is a failure of homologous chromosomes or
sister chromatids to separate properly during cell division.
There are three forms of nondisjunction: failure of sister
chromatids to separate during mitosis (10,11). This latter
mechanism is responsible for the presence of these three
cell populations in our patient (Figure 2). Failure of a pair
of homologous chromosomes to separate in meiosis I and
failure of sister chromatids to separate during meiosis II.
The structural or numerical abnormality of X chromosome
causes TS (4). The phenotypes of TS are very
heterogeneous depending on the type of abnormality (12).
The most common feature is short stature, which is found
in 95% of patients, especially in patients with 46,X,i(Xq).
This can be explained by the haplo-insufficiency of the
short stature homeobox gene (SHOX), that is in the pseudoautosomal
region (PAR1) (refractory to X inactivation)
in the short arm of X chromosome (13–16).
Ovarian dysgenesis, congenital lymphedema, pterygium
colli, and some facial features are also described in TS
(17). Some physical appearances of patients are generally
related to bone abnormalities such as a short neck, cubitus
valgus, and Madelung deformity. In our case, the proband
has a short stature, some facial features, and delayed development
of secondary sex characteristics, yet she has
no heart disease, no bone abnormalities, thyroid function
tests are normal and she does not complain from digestive
symptoms. In general, the 46,X,i(Xq) and 45,XO karyotype
show the same clinical manifestations of Turner’s
Syndrome (18). The other patients described with the 3
cells lines with double i(X) have also a phenotype suggesting
TS.
Most often, Turner Syndrome is a sporadic event,
and the risk of recurrence is not increased in subsequent
pregnancies (4). As we explained above, the formation of
the iso X in our patient took place during meiosis, therefore
a karyotype of the parents is not necessary.
The parents benefited from a genetic counseling consultation
and the patient has regular medical follow-ups
with the pediatricians to screen for other possible clinical
manifestations and to establish hormonal treatment.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication was obtained
from the parents of the proband
List of abbreviations:
TS: Turner Syndrome
i(X): isochromosome X
SD: Standard deviation
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|