
A CASE OF GLYCOGEN STORAGE DISEASE TYPE 1a
MIMICKING FAMILIAL CHYLOMICRONEMIA SYNDROME Olgac A1,*, Okur İ2, Biberoğlu G2, Ezgü FS2, Tümer L2 *Corresponding Author: Dr. Asburce Olgac, Department of Pediatric Metabolism, University of
Health Sciences, Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity and Child Health, Training and Research Hospital, Ankara,
Turkey. Tel.: +90-312-305-600. Fax: +90-312-317-03-53. E-mail: mabolgac@yahoo.com page: 103
|
INTRODUCTION
Glycogen storage disease type 1a (GSD1a) (Von
Gierke disease) is an autosomal recessively inherited inborn
error of metabolism caused by a mutation in the G6PC
gene, which encodes the catalytic subunit of glu-cose-6-
phosphatase-α (G6Pase-α) enzyme. This enzyme plays a
role in the final step of gluconeogenesis and glyco-genolysis
by hydrolyzing G6P to glucose and phosphate. Due to the
deficient activity of this enzyme, excessive accumulation
of glycogen occurs in the liver, kidney, skeletal muscles
and intestinal mucosa. As glucose homeostasis cannot be
maintained during fasting, life-threatening hypoglycemia
episodes may be seen [1].
Hyperlipidemia is the indicator of poor metabolic control
in GSD1a [2]. Patients with variable levels of triglycerides
(TGs) have been reported in the literature. We present
a case of GSD1a that was referred due to severe hypertriglyceridemia
(HTG) mimicking familial chylomicronemia
syndrome (FCS). Written consent was obtained from parents
for the preparation and publication of this manuscript.
Patients and Methods. The case being reported
here is a female patient who is the offspring of a nonconsanguineous
marriage. She was born at term after
an uncomplicated pregnancy, and hypoglycemia was detected
once in the second postnatal hour, that was easily
resolved with oral dextrose and did not recur. She was
fed exclusively with breast-milk with frequent feeds, and
her weight gain was adequate afterwards. When she was
2 months old, she had an episode of irritability, fever and
vomiting. She was admitted to an external clinic, where
laboratory analyses including complete blood count, biochemistry
and acute phase reactants were performed that
showed normal results. Urinalysis was negative. Since the
medical staff noticed her blood to be lipemic during blood
draw, the lipid profile was checked showing severely elevated
triglyceride (TG) levels (18,000.0 mg/dL, normal
range: 2.0-150.0 mg/dL). Heparinized dextrose infusion
was initiated, and she was referred to our clinic with a
pre diagnosis of FCS.
Upon admission, she was in good condition. Her
weight, height and head circumference were within normal
centiles. Physical examination revealed a rounded doll’s
face, abdominal distension, and hepatomegaly (liver was 8
cm palpable at the mid-clavicular margin). The spleen was not palpable. Lipemia was noticed (Figure-1). Laboratory
analyses showed elevated TG (10,000.0 mg/dL), total cholesterol:
927.0 mg/dL (normal range: 5.0-120.0 mg/dL),
and lactate: 6.0 mg/dL (normal range: 0.2.0-2.0 mg/dL).
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels could not be evaluated
due to high levels of TGs. Other biochemical analyses
including kidney and liver function tests, uric acid, amilase,
lipase and blood-gas analysis were within normal ranges. Due to the initial diagnosis of familial hyperlipidemia,
hydrolyzed formula containing 50.0% medium-chain
triglycerides (MCTs) and heparin with dextrose infusion
was continued. Glucose infusion rate was increased due
to hypoglycemia (47.0 mg/dL). Insulin level was checked
during hypoglycemia and was found to be low. Urine ketone
levels were positive. Metabolic tests including acylcarnitinites,
plasma and urine amino acids, and biotinidase
level were inconclusive. Highly increased lactic, 3-hydroxybutiric
and acetoacetic acids were detected in urine
organic acid analysis. Urine was checked for the presence
reducing substance, that was found to be negative.
Triglyceride levels decreased gradually to 1000.0 mg/dL
and heparin infusion was terminated. Total cholesterol
(TC) levels fell to within reference ranges. Abdominal
ultra-sonography revealed increased diffuse echogenity
of the liver.
Due to hypoglycemia and ketonuria, a gluconeogenesis
disorder was suspected. In the context of clinical
and laboratory findings, GSD1a was the most probable
diagnosis. Molecular genetic analysis of the G6PC gene
showed a homozygous missense R83C mutation that was
previously reported to be pathogenic. Frequent feedings
with formula containing MCTs was continued and TG
levels ranged within 300.0-400.0 mg/dL despite compliance
to diet. The patient is now 6 years old and severe TG
elevation has not recurred.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|